Colonial Mexico (1519-1821) was Mexico under Spanish rule, beginning with the Spanish conquistadors and ending with Mexican independence. It was part of New Spain, which in turn was part of the Spanish Empire. What is now the south-western US, from Texas to California, was part of colonial Mexico.
Born in genocide: When the Spanish conquistadors arrived in 1519, Mexico had at least 25 million people. By 1600 only a million were left. It has taken Mexico over 300 years to recover. It was not enough for the Spanish to defeat the Aztecs and other Meso-Americans in battle: they destroyed the land and used the mass killing of unarmed people as an instrument of terror.
Disease: Epidemics came one after another, of smallpox, measles and haemorrhagic fever. There was little natural immunity to such diseases in Mexico, so it was like the Black Death in Europe, but made much worse because Mexico was now a broken land. There is a thin line between disease and genocide.
Columbian Exchange: The Spanish gave Mexico not only smallpox, measles, typhus, malaria and influenza, but also Catholicism, liquor, onions, pigs, cows, sheep, horses, wheat, olives, grapes, oranges, rice, sugar, etc. Mexico in turn gave the world maize, beans, squash, pumpkins, tomatoes, tobacco, chocolate and vanilla, among other things.
Doctrine of Discovery: The pope in Rome gave the Spanish the right to take over non-Christian countries for the sake of bringing them to Christ. The Spanish did in fact set up missions that taught Meso-Americans the Christian faith, but in return the Spanish got land, labour, silver and gold. To make all this seem right and good the Spanish gave Mexico something else:
Race: Mexican society was divided by race (the percentages are
for 1810):
- 0.3% peninsulares (Spanish-born Whites)
- 18% criollos (Mexican-born Whites)
- 21% casta (mixed-race)
- 11% mestizos (part Native)
- 10% mulatos and zambos (part Black)
- 60% indios (Native Americans)
- 0.2% negros (Blacks)
The Great Whitening of the Americas did not start till the middle 1800s.
Labour: a mix of slaves, wage workers and forced labour (the hated repartimiento).
Uprisings: the most famous was the Pueblo Revolt of 1680. Joined by some mestizos and mulattoes, they drove the Spanish and their hangers-on out of New Mexico for a time. They destroyed churches, washed off the stain of baptism and annulled their Catholic marriages, returning to the old ways.
California, New Mexico, Texas: Early Spanish explorers like Estevanico and Coronado found no silver or gold, so there was little to draw the Spanish there. In the 1600s and 1700s the Spanish set up missions that would later grow into cities like Santa Fe, San Antonio and Los Angeles (thus the religious Spanish names). They built the Camino Real, the Royal Road that went north from Mexico City to the silver mines of Zacatecas and on to the Rio Grande and Sante Fe, New Mexico.
The economy was built to make Spain rich. It had mines, farms and ranches, but few businesses or industries of its own. After independence, the Spanish pulled out their money and the economy went broke.
– Abagond, 2016.
Sources: mainly “Occupied America: A History of Chicanos” (2011) by Rodolfo Acuña; “A Short Account of the Destruction of the Indies” (1542) by Bartolome de Las Casas.
See also:
- Welcome to Hispanic Heritage Month 2016
- Meso-America
- Colonial Mexico:
- Estevanico
- The Valladolid Debate
- Junipero Serra – set up missions in California. Get the dirt on that.
- Manila galleons – took Mexican silver to the Philippines where gold could be bought at half price.
- The Spanish
- their ideas of race in the 1400s
- Catholic
- Reconquista
- Vine Deloria, Jr: Conquest Masquerading as Law – more on the Doctrine of Discovery
- genocide
608
Those Spanish pieces of filth have a lot to answer for as do the Portugese!
LikeLike
The genocide of 24 millions of people in 80 years is almost incomprehensible.
Herneith
I believe in the treaty of Tordesillas in 1494. Spain and Portugal divided up the world and decided who what get what before they had even seen the countries in question!
LikeLike
As bad as the Spanish were, they were not racists and they were not segregationists.
LikeLike
In Mexico people could always intermarry regardless of race, not legally in the U.S. until recently. Also, Mexico outlawed enslavement before the U.S. did.
LikeLike
In Mexico people could intermarry regardless of race. In the U.S. people could not legally intermarry when of certain different races until recently. It varied by state and it was mostly White and Black people who were not allowed to marry. Also, Mexico outlawed enslavement before the U.S. did.
LikeLike
A guy like Antonio Banderas had at least Mestizo origins from the Americas which migrated back to the Old World (Spain) or is he part Moorish North African? Based on his facial bone structure, most likely he has Indigenous 1st Nation blood in him? Or is he just a perfect anomaly of European mixtures.
LikeLike
@ Glenn Robinson
I think it’s going too far to say the Spanish weren’t racists. They may have been better than Americans in certain aspects, but that doesn’t mean they aren’t racists and that racism didn’t and doesn’t now exist in Mexico.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Colorism is a part of Mexican culture as well as the rest of the Americas.
One of my employees told me that in the town where he grew up they would have community gatherings. The lightest skinned people sat in front with those with darker complexions sitting in the back.
So even though everyone was considerd the same race, the lightness of a person’s skin played a part in social status.
LikeLike
Don’t forget that other Irishman, Billy the Kid who terrorized New Mexico, recently stolen from the Mexicans. Fortunately, he was killed by fellow Irishman Pat Garrett.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thinking about this more, I believe it’s fair to say even the pattern of interracial marriages in colonial Mexico reveals racism:
1) Otherwise why did the Spanish find it necessary to devise a complex system of racial classification for interracial people of different admixtures?
2) IIRC, the Spanish were a lot less tolerant of interracial relationships where the Spanish/white partner was female.
3) At least in the early days of colonization, many of the Spanish men had wives back home and didn’t view their relationships with Native women as true marriage.
LikeLiked by 2 people
The Black population in Mexico is preety small. 1.2% Maybe because the Black population is small there, we don’t hear about racism being an issue there.
If you go to some place like Brazil where there is a large Black population you will see that racism is quite prevalent.
http://www.rioonwatch.org/?p=30390
LikeLike
The Black population in Mexico is preety small. 1.2% Maybe because the Black population is small there, we don’t hear about racism being an issue there.
If you go to some place like Brazil where there is a large Black population you will see that racism is quite prevalent.
http://www.rioonwatch.org/?p=30390
LikeLike
http://www.ancient-origins.net/ancient-places-americas/did-portuguese-have-secret-knowledge-about-brazil-treaty-tordesillas-006890?nopaging=1
LikeLike
I thought Los Angles were founded by Black people (more than half) and Indigenous and other
LikeLike