The eighth and last stage of genocide is denying it ever took place. This allows the genocide to continue, either now or sometime in the future.
Here are the common ways to deny a genocide:
- “Don’t rock the boat” – Or the peace talks might break down. Or contracts for oil or arms might be cancelled. Or you will look weak if you call it genocide and do nothing. Just go with the flow.
- “We are helping these people!” – and show outsiders model camps. Like how the Nazis showed the Red Cross Theresienstadt but not Auschwitz or Dachau. See how nice we are!
- Make it about the numbers – if they say 50,000 were killed, you say it was 5,000. Get into that dispute.
- Make it about words – Oh, it is just “ethnic cleansing”. Oh, it is not about race but land rights and that is not genocide. And so on. Overlooking the fact that if people only of a particular race are dying then it is about race no matter what anyone says or wants to believe. Because that kind of thing is not an “accident”.
- Make it about the accusers – question their motives. Overlooking the fact that they are telling the truth.
- Blame history – say this kind of stuff goes on all the time. Overlooking the fact that genocide is rare, despite what racists like to believe.
- Blame bad luck – blame it on disease, lack of food, lack of Western aid, etc. Overlooking the fact, say, that these people were driven off their land or moved to a place that cannot support their numbers. A trick favoured by Sudan and America.
- Blame out-of-control forces – after all genocides are often started by paramilitary forces that seem to be acting on their own. Overlooking the fact that many of these same forces are secretly supported by the government. If the government is not seriously fighting the force in question, it is receiving its blessing.
- Blame the victim – say the victims started a civil war. Overlooking the fact that there is no military reason for the mass killing of women and children.
- Dehumanize the victim – “They’re Africans. They do these sorts of things to each other.” They are not like us. Their lives do not matter. Why do you care? Overlooking the fact that everyone’s life matters, not just those who are like us or live nearby.
- Peace matters more than justice – Let us forget the past and just move on to give peace a chance. Overlooking the fact that a lasting peace can only be built on justice, otherwise there could be another round of genocide.
Genocide is rare. It is not “natural” – except to a racist. Tens of thousands of women and children of a particular race, religion or ethnicity do not just up and die by “accident”, not even in war. It is done on purpose, thought out in advance by sick minds. Who tell themselves these lies.
See also:
- Genocide Watch: 12 Ways to Deny a Genocide – with examples from Darfur. I based my post on their list but I changed up things a bit for pedagogical purposes.
- genocide
- The eight stages of genocide – see what the other seven stages are
- Holocaust denial
- How to argue like a white racist – I see genocide as an extreme form of racism. Genocide denial reminds me of the sort of things racists say – like blame-shifting, dehumanizing and blaming the victim and drawing attention away from their own actions.
- racism is not natural
‘Dehumanize the victim – “They’re Africans. They do these sorts of things to each other.” They are not like us. Their lives do not matter. Why do you care? Overlooking the fact that everyone’s life matters, not just those who are like us or live nearby’.
Herero and Namaqua Genocide, 1904-1907, 50-70% of the respective populace slaughtered the first genocide of the 20th century. The Belgian Congo estimate of 3-30 million through forced labour(rubber). Armenian Genocide 1915, 1.5 million, The Holocaust, 21 million, estimates vary. Rwanda, Sudan.
‘Peace matters more than justice – Let us forget the past and just move on to give peace a chance. Overlooking the fact that a lasting peace can only be built on justice, otherwise there could be another round of genocide.
‘ Turkey to this day denies the Armenian genocide. The turkish government become enraged when calls for the recognition of this genocide comes up.
How soon we forget!
LikeLike
Herneith Says:
The Belgian Congo estimate of 3-30 million through forced labour(rubber).
More like 7-15 million. Still shockingly evil. Also let’s not forget Stalin and what he did to Christians and other ethnicities.
Blame history – say this kind of stuff goes on all the time. Overlooking the fact that genocide is rare, despite what racists like to believe.
That is true. Also what these people tend to forget is that genocides of the past weren’t as bad as modern day genocides. One reason is the technology and another reason is the ideologies.
I am in no way whatsoever justifying these genocides.
LikeLike
I love your website maybe you already know this :
http://www.eyesondarfur.org/
LikeLike
Genocide is rare. It is not “natural” – except to a racist.
Are you sure it’s really racism? What if the victims are of the same race? I thought you were talking about genocide in general.
LikeLike
Genocide does not have to be race-based, true. I wrote that because my experience it is racists who see genocide as natural.
LikeLike
How to deny Genocide?
Read the Bible then say God is all loving!
Everything you said in this post reminds me of a stereotypical Christian respond to the Bible.
LikeLike
There is another aspect to those old biblical stories of genocide, which I do not believe has been mentioned.
And again takes us back to ‘perspectives’. For instance archaeolgist argue that the conquest of the city Jericho as depicted in the bible story is probably not accurate for a number of reasons.
This link touches upon some of the issues/contradictions etc
http://www.biblemysteries.com/lectures/jericho5.htm
So this needs to be brought into the equation…
LikeLike
Thanks for the link, J.
On a side note, some argue first genocide was committed by Homo Sapiens Sapiens (Neanderthals being victims).
LikeLike
You welcome, I was not sure whether the link does the argument justice or not. I only produced it to give the most simplistic overview of what some of the problems are when the biblical stories are studied ‘scientifically’ with regard to some of the biblical stories.
Personally I think the link gives a good overview of the issue.
I have heard that theory too about neanderthals being killed off by humans.
Somewhere within me I am not sure if this is the old anthropological view of ‘colonization’ as happened 1860 onwards and then ‘projected’ back.
Perhaps I should say here ‘some anthropologist/theorists etc’ projecting the present into the past…
LikeLike
One note: Neanderthals were humans too. Just a different, um, race. Or species? It’s undecided, as far as I know. But we (Homo Sapiens Sapiens) could procreate with them, it is believed.
Somewhere within me I am not sure if this is the old anthropological view of ‘colonization’ as happened 1860 onwards and then ‘projected’ back.
I am not sure I understand this. What are you trying to say?
LikeLike
On a side note, some argue first genocide was committed by Homo Sapiens Sapiens (Neanderthals being victims).
Mira, all definitions I’ve seen of genocide call it a PLANNED crime. I highly doubt homo sapiens sapiens had the wherewithall to plan to dispose of homo neanderthalis.
LikeLike
To J
Well I don’t think most things in the Bible actually happened the way it says they did. The problem is most Christians do, and they believe it is justified, because God did it.
To Mira
Great point about Neanderthals!
To abagond
“Genocide is rare. It is not “natural”
LOL Please. Some people say killing is not natural as well, tell that to the tribes in Papua New Guinea, who until recently were killing and eating each other. To them it was unnatural not to do so, they believed it made them stronger and smarter.
LikeLike
Folks, let’s be real clear about one thing here: killing, war, murder and natural competition are not synonyms of “genocide”.
LikeLike
I am suggesting that since ‘war and conquest’ is so much a part of human activity. Then accounting for the ‘sudden disappearence’ of the neanderthals could also explained by this process too, as opposed to something else.
So I guess what I am saying ha ha…is that I am not sure how they died, until further evidence can be obtained?
Hope this clarifies
LikeLike
Thad
That is a period in history that is mostly just speculation, but you are probably right, I doubt they had the mental capacity to plan a mass Genocide.
LikeLike
Thad
“Folks, let’s be real clear about one thing here: killing, war, murder and natural competition are not synonyms of “genocide”.
I agree, but the Bible makes it clear that mass extermination of certain “tribes” was called for by God.
Deuteronomy 20:17 comes to mind.
You must completely destroy the Hittites, Amorites, Canaanites, Perizzites, Hivites, and Jebusites, just as the LORD your God has commanded you.
LikeLike
With regard to:
Well I don’t think most things in the Bible actually happened the way it says they did. The problem is most Christians do, and they believe it is justified, because God did it.
Ths is a very good point
If we following the ‘trail’ through a minefield of different and contradictory processes.
I think most Christains would say genocide is wrong, but God allowed it back then as part of ‘his plan’. However, it is not part of his plan now.
…This if we trying to present a veridical representation
What do you think??
LikeLike
I am suggesting that since ‘war and conquest’ is so much a part of human activity. Then accounting for the ’sudden disappearence’ of the neanderthals could also explained by this process too, as opposed to something else.
Only one probablem with that theory, J: “war”, in any meaningful sense of the word, didn’t exist back then.
LikeLike
To J
Well I think it depends, if they believe God wants it then they would be for it. Most of the Germans during world war 2 were Christians, and Hitler used many speeches claiming God was with the German people, and the Jews were evil because they crucified their messiah. I do not believe the German people would have rallied as strongly behind Hitler if it wasn’t for the churches saying they were doing “Gods work.”
LikeLike
With regard to
“Only one problem with that theory, J: “war”, in any meaningful sense of the word, didn’t exist back then”.
I do not want to necessarily get into the issues of semantics, problems of language’, etc
If the idea or theory is that the homo sapiens sapiens killed off, exterminated, murdered, killed them off one by one, or even two by two… or even the word ‘war’ which I am defining as a violent conflict bewteen the neanderthals and humans wherby the former lost out and lost their lives.
I do understand the IDEA that Mira is putting forth. I hope she understood teh pointthat I was putting across, irrespective of ‘playing with ords’, definitions etc.
I hope everyone is now clear ha ha ha ha
LikeLike
Thanks Ó Dochartaigh
I understand the point you are getting at but I do not wish to address it – because I am speaking about the ‘belief’ system that a Christian has regarding these issues in the bible as opposed to how Christians behave in ‘difficult’ situations. If you follow my line of reasoning and thought.
Speaking of this issue Jehovah Witnesses are proud of their record in Nazi Germany where they refused to support the Nazis whereas the Catholic church did
LikeLike
And again, if we playing with ‘semantics’ etc.
It all depends on your definition of ‘genocide’ which will in effect determine whether homo sapiens sapiens did undertake genocide or not?
As it stands here, the definition of genocide is predicated upon what the ‘aggressor’ does ie ‘plans the systematic act to kill every neanderthals etc’.
However, if genocide is defined by what happens and/or the effects upon the victim and in terms of what the Neanderthals ‘lost’. In this present scenario it would be a ‘genocide’, since they were wiped from the face of the earth.
LikeLike
There has been a general shift in conciseness among Christians, and most human beings in the last few hundred years. God seems to be getting nicer and nicer, the Bible hasn’t changed just mans perception. It is just another reason why most human beings are “Denying Genocide” in the bible and in other circumstances. We have become nicer as a whole, and don’t want to image the monstrosities that our ancestors or their “gods” committed. Abagond is guilty of this himself just by being a Christian, and excusing these ancient people of there violence and crime, because god told them to.
LikeLike
Oh yes, just bursting with niceness.
LikeLike
I am not quite sure what you say Ó Dochartaigh.
It is not clear to me whether this response is a new position on your part.
I don’t think Christians ‘deny’ what took place in the Old Testament but see it as ‘God moving in mysterious ways’
LikeLike
To J
Well Christians tend to sugarcoat these thing more today with phrases like God works in mysterious ways and such, whereas years ago they were sinners and deserved to die. Just like so many Christians years ago believed slavery was okay because “the Bible said so.” Now there are quite a few liberal Christians who take most of the old testament as metaphor, and don’t even believe Adam and Eve were real people.
LikeLike
abagond
Compared to 2,000 years ago people are bursting with kindness.
LikeLike
@Abagond
Do you think that the whites of America want to ethnically cleanse blacks, but won’t openly admit it?
LikeLike
“I think most Christains would say genocide is wrong, but God allowed it back then as part of ‘his plan’. However, it is not part of his plan now.”
Zimmerman in his Fox interview said it was “Gods plan” that Trevon be shot thus taking away any personal responsibility from himself.
Columbus saw himself as part of Gods plan as well as the rest who colonized America and the world.
The same superiority complex God gave the ancient Israelites survived within Christianity.
The chosen people are always part of Gods plan and that is used to justify racism, genocide and economic exploitation. Heathens after all are different.
Many books written for Christians during the 1800’s and into the 1900’s that were about theology, science and social life were full of misogyny, racism and patriarchy.
It was Christians who saw Jim Crow and segregation as an “act of kindness”.
LikeLike
(about No. 10) I actually talked about genocide going on in africa to an …acquaintance of mine and he said “what about all those europeans dying in car accidents every year. Their lives matter too”. Completely out of context, wouldn´t even let me finish my sentence.
LikeLike
Extremely vital information, but only to comfirm what I have seen, through out my life. I could only ASk myself, How can puertorican people, like myself but I exclude myself on this fact. How can we celabrate and honer statues of a butcher that killed of the people of these of these beautiful Islands of the caribbean. This is why I also choose HELL over christianananaty?.
LikeLike