Disclaimer: I do think the British are human. The point of this post is to mock the reasoning in Diamed’s post, “Blacks Aren’t Human”.
No one on earth says dogs and wolves are the same species, even though it is possible for dogs to mate with wolves and have fertile offspring. The genetic differences are vast enough, the phenotypic differences in looks, behavior, and personality are great enough, that everyone instinctively recognizes dogs and wolves are different species now.
Why then are the British considered human? They could not look more different, act more different, or have more different personalities. There is a vast genetic divergence between the British and the rest of mankind dating back tens of thousands of years. And even though the British can mate with the non-British and have fertile offspring, biologically that has never been used as the exclusive standard for whether you belong to the same species or not.
Phenotypic Variations between the British and non-British:
The British, unlike most humans, do not have brown eyes and black hair. They have pale skin, pale eyes, pale hair. They have long heads, long noses and soulless, vacant eyes. Their women are shaped like boys. Everything about them is ugly.
They lack intelligence. This was so widely known in Roman times that British slaves had to be sold at a discount. Christian missionaries complained that they were a savage and unteachable race. Yet intelligence is what makes humans better than animals.
They never produced civilization on their own: before the Romans came they were barbarians living in huts. They had no writing, no cities, no public baths, no architecture. They were savages who worshipped oak trees and believed in magic and superstition.
Even during hundreds of years of Roman civilization they produced no literature, no great art, no philosophers, no contributions to the hard sciences. Nothing. And after the Romans left they quickly sank back into barbarism, into blood and violence and darkness, showing their true nature as being little better than savage animals. Something they would later prove to the whole world by wiping out the people of North America and Australia.
After the Romans left the British remained backwards for a thousand years. It would have lasted longer if the French had not stepped in to take over. In the 1400s the Aztecs and black Africans had larger cities than the British. Even when the British at last became rich and successful they had to rob a fourth of the world to do it. But despite all that wealth and power they barely held out against Nazi Germany. Further proof that they are not terribly bright.
Rape is endemic: the main countries they settled – Britain, America, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa – are all among the top 13 countries where rape is most common.
And they do not even have a human heart: in North America they made their own children into slaves! That is not how humans act.
Thanks to commenter Ikossie for pointing out Diamed’s post to me.