Nikole Hannah-Jones, a Black investigative reporter for the New York Times, spearheaded “The 1619 Project” in 2019 and won a Pulitzer Prize for it a year later. In 2017 she won a MacArthur Foundation genius grant. Even by White standards she is one of the best journalists in the US – but many on the right oppose “The 1619 Project” for showing how the US was built on slavery and racism.
In 2021, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC-CH) offered her the Knight Chair in Race and Investigative Journalism – but would not give her tenure! Most schools of journalism would jump at the chance of giving tenure to a White person even half as accomplished. Without tenure protecting her from being fired, she would have little academic freedom.
Enter the donor: Walter Hussman, Jr., (UNC ’68), heads his family’s media empire in Arkansas. In 2019 he promised to give UNC’s journalism school $25 million. So now it is called the Hussman School of Journalism and Media. And, when you walk in, you now see his Statement of Core Values. But for the pandemic, it would have already been carved in stone. Here is #4:
“The pursuit of truth is a noble goal of journalism. But the truth is not always apparent or known immediately. Journalists’ role is therefore not to determine what they believe at that time to be the truth and reveal only that to their readers, but rather to report as completely and impartially as possible all verifiable facts so that readers can, based on their own knowledge and experience, determine what they believe to be the truth.”
He said “The 1619 Project” was not objective. For example, it says, “For the most part, black Americans fought back alone” for their rights – but left out the Freedom Riders and other “courageous” Whites. To preserve the school’s objectivity he emailed and called the dean and trustees, opposing her appointment.
Note: He has yet to give the whole $25 million.
Note: According to the Five Rules of Racial Standing, which holds sway in the US, most Black people lack objectivity about race.
The dean, Susan King, stood up for Hannah-Jones:
“I was the first woman in every newsroom. I brought my perspective … to the table. I argued that women’s voices needed to be in the stories that were told. White males ran the newsrooms when I joined the business. Their experiences and judgments ruled the day. Women made a difference in the newsroom 40 years ago. Journalists with different world experiences make a difference now and must continue to do so.”
Or, as Hannah-Jones herself put it in 2020:
“[Mainstream media] has long tended to operate as stenographers of power, and we’ve taken that to be non-biased, objective reporting. So when white Americans say to me, ‘I just want factual reporting,’ what they’re saying to me is they want reporting from a white perspective … with a white normative view, and that simply has never been objective.”
Hussman seems to miss the irony that he is only proving her point.
– Abagond, 2021.
Sources: mainly Google Images and my one free article at The Assembly.
Update (July 9th 2021): When UNC at long last offered Nikole Hannah-Jones tenure, she turned them down and instead took a tenured position at Howard, the nation’s top Black university. What a brilliant move. Ta-Nehisi Coates will be joining her.
See also:
- Nikole Hannah-Jones
- The 1619 Project
- media:
- Jim Crow
578
A Pulitzer Prize winner, a MacArthur Genius Grant winner and an acclaimed journalist. Still being denied tenure because Conservatives are afraid of the truth of racism in America. If these Conservatives faced the truth, they wouldn’t have to be afraid of the truth.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Why are powerful people afraid of the truth about America? Why are people so afraid of Nikole Hannah Jones? That’s a question that needs answering. It’s because antiblackness is the foundation of this nation. Whiteness is not possible without slavery, segregation, and second class citizenship imposed on us by the powers that be.\
Nikole Hannah Jones deserve better.
Reynagirl14
LikeLike
Update: When UNC at long last offered Nikole Hannah-Jones tenure, she turned them down and instead took a tenured position at Howard, the nation’s top Black university. What a brilliant move. Ta-Nehisi Coates will be joining her.
LikeLike
Hooray! For Sister NHJ. I am glad she made the decision to go to Howard University and tell UNC to kick rocks. Glad she’s going where her gifts and talents will be honored. So happy for her.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I finally read the Assembly article that Abagond provided a link to under his sources.
I noticed the article mentioned that the UNC committees involved in the hiring process did recommend tenure for Nikole Hannah-Jones. It was one short subordinate clause and therefore easy to miss, but as someone who’s somewhat familiar with university hiring practices, it jumped out at me.
I followed some links in the Assembly article and found one that described in more detail what happened:
http://www.ncpolicywatch.com/2021/05/19/pw-special-report-after-conservative-criticism-unc-backs-down-from-offering-acclaimed-journalist-a-tenured-position/
UNC’s chancellor countered with a proposal to the Board of Trustees of giving Hannah-Jones a five-year non-tenured appointment, at the end of which she would be considered for full tenure. The board agreed to this compromise.
I guess I want to point this out because sometimes what we think of as an institution really is divided on itself. The university did want to give Hannah-Jones full tenure immediately, if the university is the dean and the faculty of the journalism school, the various professors and administrators on the hiring committees, the provost, and the chancellor. The university did not want to give her tenure, if the university is the Board of Trustees, powerful conservative alumni, and the increasingly conservative Board of Governors, who control the appointments of the trustees.
It doesn’t appear that all the trustees were opposed to giving Hannah-Jones tenure, either. One spoke on the condition of anonymity:
Another trustee indicated that they may have felt constrained by a higher entity:
I will say that the trustees could have still chosen to fight this battle even if it meant losing their appointments, and it’s more than disappointing that they did not. However, I suspect like most boards of this type, the majority of the trustees are right-leaning moderates and conservatives, with the more progressive trrustees not having the numbers to sway the board’s decisions.
I’m glad Hannah-Jones has chosen to go to Howard, where she will be fully supported and appreciated. But I also sympathize with the people on the campus of Chapel Hill who did in fact know exactly what she was worth and were frustrated in their attempts to grant her the tenure they knew she deserved from the beginning.
LikeLike