The US military-industrial complex (1939- ) is made up of the Pentagon, its armed forces, the universities that do its research, and the US businesses that make its bombs, bullets, planes and so on. What was a necessity in the early 1940s during the Second World War became a habit-forming mix of money and war, so that now, in the 2010s, the US seems sunk in endless wars.
And yet neither of the two main political party speaks out against it. Not even billionaire “outsider” Donald Trump. To the contrary, he wants to increase military spending by $54 billion in 2018 – even though the US already spends more on the military than the next ten countries put together.

Source: NBC News.
In 1953 President Eisenhower said in his speech “Chance for Peace”:
“Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed.
“This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children.
“The cost of one modern heavy bomber is this:
- a modern brick school in more than 30 cities.
- It is two electric power plants, each serving a town of 60,000 population.
- It is two fine, fully equipped hospitals.
- It is some 50 miles of concrete pavement.”
These days in the US only the far left still seriously talks like that. Yet Eisenhower was a five-star general, a war hero, a centre-right Republican president.
Eisenhower as president kept the country out of any big war and cut military spending. The air force and army said he was being soft. In 1960 Senator John Kennedy ran for president and championed their cause, frightening voters with talk of a “missile gap” that never was. He won.
In 1961, Eisenhower said in his “Farewell Address”:
“Until the latest of our world conflicts, the United States had no armaments industry. … But now … we have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. Added to this, three and a half million men and women are directly engaged in the defense establishment. We annually spend on military security more than the net income of all United States corporations.”
This was “compelled” by the rise of world communism:
“We face a hostile ideology – global in scope, atheistic in character, ruthless in purpose, and insidious in method. Unhappily the danger it poses promises to be of indefinite duration.”
World communism is no longer a threat, yet now world jihadism is seen in almost the very same way, almost word for word. How odd.
Eisenhower warned that such a huge war machine is a threat to democracy:
“In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.”
As proved by the Vietnam War just years later.
– Abagond, 2017.
See also:
- Martin Luther King’s Riverside Speech against the Vietnam War
- Vietnam War
- The three pillars of US racism
- The term “terrorism”
- jihad
- Republican
- deep state
537
The American people allowed this monster to grow and now we serve it.
https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BMTI0NTY3MTAzOV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTYwOTA5NDk2.V1.jpg
LikeLike
@ Afrofem
Yup.
LikeLike
Update: Added a chart and a political cartoon at the end.
LikeLike
Wait, I thought huge science-military projects were a thing during Eisenhower’s days? Sure his rhetoric was “peace, peace” but there was still a lot of money spent for military research. Well, the Cold War was getting steam and well, technically, it wasn’t a “war” war but it did require a lot of money and scientists working during those days on military projects. It’s not like it stopped until Kennedy.
Take space race, for example, which was ignited in the 1950s. Speaking of which: do you have a post about space race and would that be something you are interested in writing about?
I mean, I agree with this post but I am not sure Eisenhower was so innocent…?
LikeLike
Is this article attempting to imply that we should shut down protection of democracy because someone has a problem with a military complex?
Are we expected to turn the other cheek?
We have at least two generations of suffering under this Islamic Jihadist invasion of the western nations–
We have a bully in SEA still expanding over territories in nations nor strong enough to defend themselves–
It is best to keep our military finely tuned!
LikeLike
“Is this article attempting to imply that we should shut down protection of democracy? – Brien Doyle
WHAT? You mean to tell me we have democracy in Amerika?
For many generations, the US working class has answered this call to serve as what US Marine General Smedley Butler (War is a Racket – “The Hell With War” he said, he once deemed, ‘gangsters for capitalism’. Millions upon millions have lost life and limb to clear the path for new global markets, steal and extract valuable natural resources from other lands, and ensure the procurement of trillions of dollars of corporate profit for a privileged few.” (circa 1935)
https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/54/SmedleyButler.jpeg&imgrefurl=https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:SmedleyButler.jpeg&h=2000&w=1600&tbnid=4ey-NUaEk8uLlM:&tbnh=186&tbnw=148&usg=__pwFes4FZePiPGX4H9EIdMsDObrc=&vet=10ahUKEwjR7ceTvozTAhVX2WMKHU2ICykQ_B0IbzAK..i&docid=unYMy24dNV_s_M&itg=1&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjR7ceTvozTAhVX2WMKHU2ICykQ_B0IbzAK&ei=cHPkWNH1CNeyjwPNkK7IAg#h=2000&imgrc=4ey-NUaEk8uLlM:&tbnh=186&tbnw=148&vet=10ahUKEwjR7ceTvozTAhVX2WMKHU2ICykQ_B0IbzAK..i&w=1600
LikeLike