Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for Aug, 2013

Joshua Solomon

screen-shot-2013-02-10-at-3-42-36-pm

Joshua Solomon (c. 1974- ) was a White American university student who made himself look Black in 1994 to see what it would be like. He was going to do it for about four months and visit different parts of the country. He only lasted a week.

We know of at least three other “Black like me” cases:

  • 1947: Ray Sprigle
  • 1959: John Howard Griffin
  • 1969: Grace Halsell

Griffin is the famous one: he wrote “Black Like Me” (1960). When Solomon read his book in high school he knew right then that he wanted to try it himself.

Solomon grew up in Silver Spring, Maryland and had plenty of Black friends:

Whenever something went down, they always said it was racism. Education, jobs, crime, poverty, social misunderstandings – they blamed everything on color. “It’s a white man’s world,” they would say.

But he did not believe his black friends:

… secretly, inside, I’d always felt that many black people used racism as a crutch, an excuse. Couldn’t they just shrug off the rankings of ignorant people?

He did not believe Langston Hughes or Cornel West either.

So he went to a doctor who gave him pills to turn his white skin brown. The doctor warned him that it could lead to liver damage.

Solomon shaved the hair off his head but dressed the same, acted the same, talked the same. He had the same money and education. It was just his brown skin and bald head that were different (pictured above).

After about a month of taking pills his skin was dark enough for the doorman at his brother’s place in Baltimore to be rude and suspicious.

He travelled to Washington, DC, Atlanta and, like Griffin, Gainesville, Georgia.

As a White man he looks and smiles at White people and they smile back. But as a Black man whites look away, lock their doors, assume he is dangerous or up to no good.

Shopping while Black: One time a white person did not look away:

I went to a nearby drugstore, a white employee followed me around the store. At the drink refrigerator, I turned suddenly and stared right at her, letting her know that I knew what she was doing – shadowing me as if I were a potential thief. I’d hoped to embarrass her, but she didn’t flinch. She stared right back, hands on her hips.

The police would stop him even though he was just walking down the street minding his own business.

Restaurants would tell him they were full, even when they were not, restaurants where nearly everyone sitting down was – White.

White respect and friendliness that he took for granted was gone. Instead Whites regarded him with disdain, even fear. He met a homeless White man, blond hair, blue eyes, who had almost nothing in this world: even he looked down on Blacks!

By his second day in Gainesville he was in tears. It was just too much! He went back home to let the pills wear off and turn white again. *Clicks heels three times.*

rubyslippe

Thanks to Matari for suggesting this post.

See also:

Read Full Post »

Books on American history

628x471

Below are the main books I use for American history. I am not saying they are the best – just the ones I use. Commenters can probably come up with some better ones.

The perfect American history book would be produced by five historians: a Black American, a Native American, a White American, an Asian American and a Latino American. They would each have equal editorial control, with the Native American as the head.

As far as I know, there is no such book. Therefore I have done the next best thing: bought books about Black American history by Black Americans, about Asian American history by Asian Americans and so on. This comes from the bitter experiences of depending on white historians to get things right.

Native American history:

venables

Robert W. Venables, “American Indian History” (2004) – it goes on and on about treaties, but that is to be expected.

Black American history:

51LxC9KT7AL._SY300_

Lerone Bennett, Jr, “Before the Mayflower” (1962) – I no longer have this book and it appears to be out of print, but it was where I learned the basics of Black American history. It is more or less burned into my brain. Especially the part about the bodies of slaves at the bottom of the Atlantic.

painter

Nell Irvin Painter, “Creating Black Americans” (2006) – a good, solid, up-to-date overview.

gates

Henry Louis Gates, Jr, “Life Upon These Shores” (2011) – Gates is pretty whitewashed and his fact checking is not always rock solid, but the book has tons of stuff I never knew about. Knowing Gates, though, most of the book was probably written by whites.

White American history:

41Sf-SfsJjL._SY346_

Peter N. Carroll and David W. Noble, “The Free and the Unfree” (1977) – race and class conscious, helps you to understand broader patterns, tends not to sugarcoat, knows about Cointelpro. Now in its third edition (2001).

zinn

Howard Zinn, “A People’s History of the United States” (2003) – openly left-wing but has much of the stuff they do not teach at American high school. There is an edition for young people.

loewen

James Loewen, “Lies My Teacher Told Me” (2007) – not a history but a look at the holes and biases in history as taught at American high schools. I always check what Loewen says.

Asian American history:

takaki

Ronald Takaki, “A Different Mirror” (1993) – talks about all races but seems to be best on White and Asian Americans. Not so good on Blacks and Natives. Still, if I had to recommend a single book to someone who did not know much, it would be this one. There is an edition for young people.

chang

Iris Chang, “The Chinese in America” (2003) – I have not read any of this one yet, but it looks good. She is best known for “The Rape of Nanking” (1997).

Latino American history:


Rodolfo Acuña, “Occupied America: A History of Chicanos” (2004) – If you read only one book on Chicano history, this is the one! Acuña is a highly respected Chicano historian. His book is now in its seventh edition. Banned from Tucson schools, so you know it must be good!

See also:

Read Full Post »

Sweet Sensation: Sad Sweet Dreamer

Remarks:

This song went to #1 on the British charts in 1974, #14 on the American pop charts in 1975. Sweet Sensation, Britain’s answer to the Stylistics, was, so far as I know, the only British soul act to have a number-one song during the 1970s. They come from Manchester.

Lyrics:

Sad sweet dreamer
It’s just one of those things
you put down to experience
Sad sweet dreamer
It’s just one of those things
you put down to experience

Been another blue day without you girl
Been another sad summer song
I’ve been thinking about you girl
All night long

Been another sad tear on my pillow
Been another memory to tell me you’re the one, girl
I’ve been thinking about you girl
All night long

Sad sweet dreamer
It’s just one of those things
you put down to experience
Sad sweet dreamer
It’s just one of those things
you put down to experience

Been another long night and I’ve missed you girl
Been another story from those endless magazines
Can’t help thinking about you girl
All night long

Sad sweet dreamer
It’s just one of those things
you put down to experience
Sad sweet dreamer
It’s just one of those things
you put down to experience

Was so happy when I found you
But how was I to know
That you would leave me walking
down that road

Been another hard luck story
Been another man who thought
that he was oh so strong
Been thinking about you girl
All night long

Sad sweet dreamer
It’s just one of those things
you put down to experience
Sad sweet dreamer
It’s just one of those things
you put down to experience
Sad sweet dreamer

Read Full Post »

Christopher Lane

chris_lane_540x386

Christopher Lane (c. 1991-2013) was an Australian studying in America on a baseball scholarship. On August 16th 2013 he was shot dead in Duncan, Oklahoma by three teenagers because they were “bored”.

The State Department said they were “deeply saddened” and extended their condolences to Lane’s family and loved ones.

130820-suspects-oklahoma-545p.photoblog600

The suspects (from left to right in the picture):

  • James Francis Edwards Jr., age 15, black
  • Chancey Allen Luna, age 16, black
  • Michael Dewayne Jones, age 17, white

The crime:

Most of what we know so far comes from witnesses and the police confession of Jones.

Jones:

We were bored and decided to kill somebody.

They saw Lane, who was out for a run, and followed him in their car. Jones is driving, Edwards is sitting next to him, Luna is in the back seat. Luna pulls out his gun and – pop! – shoots Lane in the back. They speed away.

Lane staggers, falls to his knees and then pitches forward, falling on his face. Witnesses come to his aid. He is gasping for breath, turning blue. They give him CPR but a minute later he is dead. They close his eyes. The police arrive.

Later the police receive a call  that there are three youths parked in a car by a church. They have guns and are threatening to kill someone. It is the same car seen at the Lane shooting. The police arrest them. They find a gun in the car, but it is not the murder weapon.

Some background: Edwards, in the months before the shooting, was on the Internet showing off guns, talking about hurting people. He has been accused of making a death threat. He has had run-ins with the police before.

Charges:

  • Luna and Edwards are charged with first-degree murder and will be tried as adults. If found guilty, they face life in prison.
  • Jones is charged as an accessory to murder after the fact and will be tried as a “youthful offender” in adult court. He could get only two years.

Was it racial?

Lane was white – was the killing racially motivated?

Edwards back in April tweeted:

90% of white ppl are nasty. #HATE THEM

A friend doubts it was racial: Edwards’s own girlfriend is white, Luna’s mother is white. Jones himself is white. The police and the district attorney also doubt it.

Selective outrage?

Glenn Beck and others ask where is Al Sharpton on this one? How come the press is not going nuts over this like they did with Trayvon Martin?

But if this were like the Trayvon Martin case, then:

  1. The police would wait a month or so before arresting the suspects and putting them in jail.
  2. Lane would be painted as a thug, as someone who deserved to die.
  3. A nearly-all black jury would let the suspects go free.
  4. The case would be played down with talk about white-on-white crime.

If anything, the Lane case shows how even white foreigners have stronger civil rights in America than do black citizens.

Thanks to Biff and R B White for suggesting this post. 

See also:

Read Full Post »

march-washington-final-postcard

There will be two marches to mark the 50th anniversary of the March on Washington on August 28th 1963, both ending at the Lincoln Memorial (links go to the march’s website):

The first march is expected to be the large one. It is conceived in the same spirit as the 1963 march. Like it, it has the support of civil rights and labour organizations (some of the same ones, in fact). Feminist and LGBT organizations will take part too. Martin Luther King, III, Dr King’s oldest son, will speak. So will John Lewis, the only speaker at the 1963 march who is still alive (back then he was 23, the leader of SNCC). Emmett Till’s family is expected to be there (the 1963 march was held on the eighth anniversary of his lynching).

Conveners: Martin Luther King, III & Rev. Al Sharpton, National Action Network Co-Convened by: AFL-CIO, AFSCME, AFT, APRI, HRC, LCCR, NAACP, NBJC, NCBW, NCNW, NEA, NOW, NUL, NCBCP, SCLC, SEIU, UAW, The King Center, National African American Clergy Network, CWBI and others.

The National Action Network’s website says:

On Saturday, August 24, 2013 we will gather at 8AM at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, DC to stand together against the recent attack on voter rights, against Stand Your Ground and racial profiling, and to continue to raise awareness on unemployment, poverty, gun violence, immigration, gay rights and other critical issues affecting our nation.

The second march is more about marking the 50th anniversary. President Obama will speak in front of the Lincoln Memorial. Presidents Carter and Clinton will be there. John Lewis will speak at that one too. At 3.00pm Eastern Time (19.00 GMT), bells will ring across the country to mark when Dr King gave his “I Have a Dream” speech.

Obama:

It’s part of my generation’s formative memory, and it’s a good time for us to do some reflection. Obviously, after the Trayvon Martin case, a lot of people have been thinking about race, but I always remind people — and, in fact, I have a copy of the original program in my office, framed — that that was a march for jobs and justice; that there was a massive economic component to that.

The Global Freedom Festival will take place in the days between the two marches, four days of “education, entertainment and activities” focused on the “freedoms to participate in government, prosper in life and peacefully co-exist.”

Six museums will have exhibits marking the 50th anniversary.

The 50th anniversary comes at a time of both great progress and troubling regress: on the one hand America has its first black president, yet in just the past two months we have seen the gutting of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the Zimmerman verdict. John Lewis says of the Zimmerman verdict:

I don’t think anything disturbed me more since the murder of Emmett Till. And I remember when Emmett Till was murdered, lynched, on 28 August 1955.

 See also:

Read Full Post »

Joan of the Upper West Side

john-schiumo

Joan of the Upper West Side, a liberal New Yorker, is a priceless example clueless racism and classism:

On August 14th 2013 she called into John Schiumo’s talk show, “The Call”, on NY1, an all-news television station in New York. He asked her if she was for Bill de Blasio, who is running for mayor. She said no because of his position on “stop and frisk”.

Under “stop and frisk” the police racially profile black and Latino men, stopping and searching them for drugs and guns – pretty much whenever they want. A federal judge had ruled it unconstitutional the day before.

Here is the exchange:

JOHN SCHIUMO: Joan, you just heard from Paul on Twitter who says, “Who in the city is enthusiastic for a Mayor de Blasio?” Are you, on any level?

JOAN: No, I was at first because of this “stop and frisk” — which I’m totally against – but when I saw him on the street with his entourage, I had gone up to him and introduced myself and told him how active I was in liberal politics, and I said to him, “You’re not going to end ‘stop and frisk’ in Manhattan, right? Just in Staten Island, Brooklyn, and Queens (and I’m still up in the air about The Bronx). And he said “Why should I not have it in Manhattan?” And I said, “Ugh, you can’t expect us to live by the same rules we dictate to other people for heaven’s sake! Just because people like me are against ‘stop and frisk’ in places like Brooklyn and Queens and Staten Island doesn’t mean we don’t want it to continue in Manhattan! I mean: Manhattan is special. We are New York! Brooklyn and Queens and Staten Island, I …. I don’t even like talking about those kinds of places!

JOHN SCHIUMO: I’m assuming you were sarcastic an—

JOAN: No! No! I’m being sincere!

JOHN SCHIUMO: Oh, you – [laughs in disbelief] you were being sincere?

JOAN: I don’t know why that’s funny!

JOHN SCHIUMO: Why is that funny? That’s one of the funniest things I’ve ever heard in eight years of this program.

JOAN: Well, in all due respect, think about it this way: Affordable housing – I mean, New Yorkers accept that kind of thing in the boroughs, but you don’t want those people living around you! Of course, I would be the first to say anyone in Brooklyn and Queens and Staten Island would be prejudiced for that, but I mean, ugh, I’m not a hypocrite!

That was followed by callers informing Schiumo what a terrible person Joan is.

As you might have gathered, Manhattan is the borough of New York where most of the rich white people live. The Upper West Side is a white liberal part of Manhattan – it has the very kind of people the New York Times is written by and for.

Thanks to Joe for telling me about this.

See also:

Read Full Post »

March on Washington, 1963

march-on-washington-wide_aerial-view-Getty_slideshow

The March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom (August 28th 1963) was where Dr Martin Luther King, Jr gave his “I Have a Dream Speech”. Some 250,000 Americans of all colours marched to the Lincoln Memorial a hundred years after President Lincoln signed the Emancipation Proclamation – and one day after W.E.B. Du Bois died.

Demands:

  • Pass the Civil Rights Bill.
  • Desegregate all school districts.
  • End discrimination in housing and employment or lose federal funding.
  • Minimum wage above $2.00 ($15.23 in 2013 dollars).
  • Enforce the Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection of the law regardless of race).
  • Full and fair employment.

Blacks in 1963 (and now):

  • Poverty rate: 48% (now 28%, but still three times the White rate);
  • Life expectancy: 7 years less than Whites (now 4);
  • Unemployment rate: 2.5 times the White rate (now 1.9);
  • Congress: 1% Black (now 8%. Blacks are 13% of the country).

Birmingham-hose

Background: That spring 150,000 in Birmingham, Alabama protested police brutality and segregation. Police chief Bull Connor had them beat up – unarmed men, women and children! He set dogs on them, turned fire hoses on them. Shocking images appeared on television coast to coast and in newspapers all over the world.

130415151936-king-jail-story-top

Martin Luther King was arrested on Good Friday. He wrote “Letter from Birmingham Jail”:

one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws…

Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.

Protests turned violent, spreading to cities North and South.

President Kennedy got on television, called it a “moral crisis”:

One hundred years of delay have passed since President Lincoln freed the slaves, yet their heirs, their grandsons, are … not yet freed from social and economic oppression.

He asked Congress to pass the Civil Rights Bill.

Hours later Medgar Evers was shot dead.

White Southern Congressmen blocked the Civil Rights Bill.

A. Philip Randolph, a Black labour leader, pushed the idea of a march on Washington to show public support for the bill. It was Randolph’s threat of a march on Washington in 1941 that got President Roosevelt to sign an executive order outlawing racial discrimination by war contractors.

President Kennedy told Black leaders to call off the march. They said they could not stop it even if they wanted to. So Kennedy did the next best thing: he got them to water it down.

That meant James Baldwin could not speak.

That meant John Lewis, the head of SNCC, could not say this:

We will march through the South, through the heart of Dixie, the way Sherman did. We shall pursue our own “scorched earth” policy and burn Jim Crow to the ground – nonviolently. We shall fragment the South into a thousand pieces and put them back together in the image of democracy.

Instead we got Dr King saying this:

mlk06

I have a dream that one day the state of Alabama … will be transformed into a situation where little black boys and black girls will be able to join hands with little white boys and white girls and walk together as sisters and brothers.

A few weeks later on a Sunday morning the Klan bombed a Black church in Birmingham, Alabama and killed four Black girls.

CRT-bombings

See also:

Read Full Post »

Remarks:

If you could bake down VH1 Soul to 4 minutes and 21 seconds, it would be this video and a Montel Williams ad for MoneyMutual payday loans. This song went to #50 on the American R&B charts in 1997.

Lyrics:

Chorus:
You know that seein’ is believing
Don’t say you love me if you’re leavin’
You know that seein’ is believing
Don’t say you love me if you’re leavin’

Suddenly you up and take your love away
Like a dream, it happened all in just one day
Could it be that I was running out of time
Is it me, or are you playing with my mind
Don’t you know that everything you said
Is messin’ with my head
And mama said

{Chorus

Ooh ooh wee
Time has helped, me open up my eyes to you
Now I see, you’re not worth what you put me through
Could it be that you were running out of time
Now I see that you were playing with my mind
Don’t you know that nothing that you said
Is messing with my head
And mama said

{Chorus (2x)

Read Full Post »

Magical Progress

bobesponja-600x350

Magical Progress is my name for the American idea that everything just naturally gets better all the time without anyone trying too hard. Not just in science and technology but even morally, culturally, intellectually, politically – in every way!

How to tell if society is progressing:

  1. Only consider how well-to-do white people are doing, like the kind who appear on television or write for the New York Times. What goes on in your neighbourhood does not count, unless it is white and has a median income of at least twice the national average.
  2. Eurocentrism: Judge other cultures, countries and civilizations by the West. That way the West always seems to be best! And Westernization always counts as progress.
  3. Period thinking: Judge other periods of Western history by your own. That way the West always seems to be getting better!
  4. Science, technology and consumer goods: Count every advance, even if it leads to widespread destruction and suffering (genocide, slavery, colonialism, global warming, etc).
  5. Political rights and morals: Only count advances, never reverses. Freeing the slaves counts, enslaving them in the first place does not. Or: civil rights reforms count, but weakening those rights does not.
  6. Art and architecture: Any change counts as an advance.
  7. Religion: Decline in religion counts as an advance.

That means stuff like this does not count:

  • The George Zimmerman verdict makes it feels like 1955.
  • Gutting the Voting Rights Act by the Supreme Court makes it feel like 1965.
  • Minimum wage adjusted for inflation makes it feel like 1978.

That means you do not have to concern yourself with:

  1. Voting and activism: because things are always getting better on their own! Cool!
  2. All Americans: because only well-to-do whites matter. So to keep up on the news you only have to read the New York Times.
  3. Other cultures, peoples or periods of history. So no need, say, to read and take seriously books written by people of other times, places or races.
  4. History. We are way better than the past! What could we possibly learn?

The progress is so magical that professors are left amazed, wondering what the secret to the West’s success is! Some white people, unironically, say it is their “values”.

In fact, though, Magical Progress is neither Magical nor Progress:

  • The “magic” comes from the barrel of a gun. White Americans got rich by robbing Indians of their land and blacks of their labour. Britain robbed a fourth of the world.
  • The “progress” is largely an ethnocentric illusion, one that takes in not just one’s own culture as the measure of all, but one’s period in history too.

For example:

  • By the period thinking of most Americans in 1900, America in 2013 is falling apart due to lack of religion. It has shockingly high rates of crime, abortion, illegitimacy and broken homes. What good is a video game, say, if you have no father, if you are going to hell?
  • Apocalyptic Regress: Whites have torn Black and Native Americans from their land, broken their families and destroyed their culture.

See also:

Read Full Post »

Notes on xPraetorius

Black-Knight-monty-python-380120_800_441

XPraetorius reminds me of the Black Knight in Monty Python. Click the picture for more.

I have not written a blog post since Tuesday. Instead I have been commenting and moderating the “Was Hitler evil?” thread. In the post I took the moral reasoning that White Americans apply to their own history and applied it to Hitler and the Holocaust to show how broken it is.

Enter xPraetorius, who on his own blog said:

… Abagond’s premise is that I’m a racist by virtue of the color of my skin. That’s offensive, racist, vile, outrageous, disgusting. At the VERY least it’s rude. When Abagond tried — hard — to equate Hitler with white people and white people with Hitler, he was at the VERY LEAST rude.

To defend the honour of white people on my blog he proceeded to use some of the very same broken moral reasoning. Unironically. Missing the point.

So, while this stuff is still fresh in my mind, some notes:

  1. He thinks anti-black racism in America is no longer a “big problem”: because he believes in the Bootstrap Myth (his “5 points”), the Black President argument and because, if White Americans were truly racist, they would not allow blacks to qualify for welfare. He sees welfare as a kind of reparations, to the tune of $17 trillion.
  2. His figure of $17 trillion does not take into account that most welfare does not go to black people nor does it seem to account for the cuts and reforms made to welfare since 1980.
  3. His best on-topic comment:

    this morally broken reasoning is not being taught in schools; preached in churches; broadcast over any radio stations with any reach; published in any newspapers with any circulation; used as a platform by any serious candidates for public office; sung in any popular songs; spread about in any medium of any reach whatsoever anywhere. So, again, even if your statement were true of any significant number of white people anywhere — it’s not, but even if it were — it represents less of a problem than slow drivers on the interstate.

    And yet he uses the morally broken reasoning himself! In that very thread. I have noticed that white people will say the same thing, word for word, coast to coast, yet it does not seem to be coming from the public White American culture, as he points out here. That is strange, I admit. I call it the Secret Course on Whiteness.

  4. He uses the gaslighting, NYPD definition of racism: I am racist only if I say I am. That is why he made such a big deal about me reading the minds of white people: racism is a matter of intention. Since I cannot read minds, I cannot tell if a white person is racist. I can only imagine it. 
  5. He says I am a race baiter. He sees me like how I see Stormfront, skinheads and anti-Semites: dangerously spreading hate and prejudice. I am “toxic”, worse than any residual anti-black racism left in America. I have become what I hate.

See also:

Read Full Post »

Was Hitler evil?

hitler-smiling-1

Was Hitler evil?

Most White Americans will say yes: he killed 6 million Jews in the Holocaust!

But to avoid any double standard we should apply the same moral reasoning White Americans apply to their own history:

  1. Everyone does it. Tribalism goes back to at least the invention of the spear. History is full of mass killing of civilians: Rwanda, Congo, Darfur, Srebrenica, Hiroshima, Hanoi, Gaza, Dresden, Nanking, Tamerlane, Alexander the Great,  Mongols, Assyrians, Iroquois, the killing of Armenians, Kurds, American Indians, Australian Aboriginals, Tasmanians, Namibians and on and on. If Hitler killed more people than some others, it was because he had better technology.
  2. Technology made him do it. Anyone with Hitler’s technology would have done the same thing.
  3. Europeans kill each other all the time. What’s the big deal?
  4. Jews are racist too. They have forced Palestinians off their land, apply separate laws to them and regularly massacre Palestinian civilians.
  5. Americans are no better. They have forced American Indians off their land, applied separate laws to them and regularly massacred American Indian civilians.
  6. Hitler is not uniquely evil. See above.
  7. Hitler’s intentions were good. He saw the Holocaust as doing the world a favour.
  8. It was the times! The West back then was nakedly racist. Racism had the backing of science. The book Hitler called his Bible was bought by over a million Americans: “The Passing of the Great Race” (1916) by Madison Grant, a rich New Yorker. The word genocide was not invented till 1943 and not properly defined till after the war – by the winners to condemn Hitler! We should not judge the past by current morals.
  9. We should be grateful. Germans invented the printing press, car, jet plane, rocket, etc. They gave us much of the modern medicine that allows most people to live past 40. Albert Schweitzer and other Germans have helped people in Africa. Condemning Hitler without pointing out all the good Germans have done is unbalanced and hypocritical.
  10. Get over it! It took place a long time ago. My family did not take part in it. No one you know was affected by it. Why make such a big deal about it? The past is dead and gone. There are more important issues.
  11. It is racist to talk about racism. Talking about anti-Semitism keeps it alive. Condemning Hitler is divisive.
  12. You can dismiss what Americans say about Hitler: they were his enemies; many of their journalists and historians are Jewish; their schools teach patriotic lies.

Every single one of these arguments, with the names changed, have been used on this blog to downplay American racism, slavery and genocide.

W.E.B. Du Bois:

there was no Nazi atrocity – concentration camps, wholesale maiming and murder, defilement of women or ghastly blasphemy of childhood – which the Christian civilization of Europe had not long been practicing against colored folk in all parts of the world in the name of and for the defense of a Superior Race born to rule the world.

See also:

Read Full Post »

OutKast: Hey Ya!

Remarks:

Hard to believe this song will be ten years old next month.  It went to #9 on the American R&B charts in 2003.

The video is made from Andre 3000 performing the song 23 times and putting the performances together on video to make a band. Add to that a cast of over a hundred screaming girls.

Lyrics:

[Intro]
One, two, three, uh!

[Verse One – Andre 3000]
My baby don’t mess around
Because she loves me so
And this I know for sure.
Uh, But does she really wanna
But can’t stand to see me
Walk out the door.
Don’t try to fight the feelin’
‘Cause the thought alone is killing me right now..
Uh, thank god for mom and dad
For sticking two together
‘Cause we don’t know how…
UH!

[Chorus:]
Hey… ya.
Hey ya.
Hey… ya.
Hey ya.
Hey… ya.
Hey ya.
Hey… ya.
Hey ya.

[Verse Two – Andre 3000]
You think you’ve got it
Oh, you think you’ve got it
But got it just don’t get it
‘Til there’s nothing at all
We get together
Oh, we get together
But separate’s always better when there’s feelings involved
If what they say is “Nothing is forever”
Then what makes, then what makes, then what makes
Then what makes, what makes, what makes love the exception
So why you, why you
Why you, why you, why you are we so in denial
When we know we’re not happy here…
Y’all don’t want me here you just wanna dance

[Chorus]
Hey… ya. (OH OH)
Hey ya. (OH OH)
Hey… ya. (Don’t want to meet your daddy, OH OH)
Hey ya. (Just want you in my Caddy OH OH)
Hey… ya. (OH OH, don’t want to meet yo’ mama OH OH)
Hey ya. (Just want to make you cumma OH OH)
Hey… ya. (I’m, OH OH I’m, OH OH)
Hey ya. (I’m just being honest OH OH, I’m just being honest)

[Bridge – Andre 3000]
Hey, alright now
Alright now fellas yeah!
Now what’s cooler than bein’ cool?
(ICE COLD!)
I can’t hear ya’
I say what’s, what’s cooler than bein’ cool?
(ICE COLD!)
Whooo…
Alright, alright, alright, alright
Alright, alright, alright, alright
Alright, alright, alright, alright
Alright, alright,
OK now ladies (yeah!)
Now we gon’ break this thing down in just a few seconds
Now don’t have me to break this thing down for nothing
Now I wanna see y’all on your baddest behavior
Lend me some sugar, I am your neighbor
Uh!Here we go know…
Shake it, shake, shake it, shake it (oh oh)
Shake it, shake it, shake, shake it, shake it, shake it (oh oh)
Shake it, shake it like a Polaroid Picture, shake it, shake it
Shh you got to, shake it, shh shake it, shake it, got to shake it
(Shake it sugar) shake it like a Polaroid Picture

[Verse Three – Andre 3000 (Repeating “Shake it” in background)]
Now all Beyoncé’s and Lucy Liu’s
And baby dolls, get on the floor
(Get on the floor)
You know what to do.
You know what to do.
You know what to do!

[Chorus]
Hey… ya. (OH OH)
Hey ya. (OH OH)
Hey… ya. (OH OH)
Hey ya. (Uh oh, Hey ya)
Hey… ya. (OH OH)
Hey ya. (Uh, uh, OH OH)
Hey… ya. (OH OH)
Hey ya. (OH OH)

[Chorus continues until fade]

Read Full Post »

multiracial frame

children-multiracial3

Credit: Dygas/Getty

The multiracial frame (by 2050?) is my name for the lens through which most Americans would see themselves and their society if it were ever to live up to its ideals and became a successful multiracial society. It would replace the white racial frame that most Americans now hold. In time it would make the anti-racist counter-frames of blacks, Natives, Chicanos and others unnecessary.

It would not be this fake Kumbaya / post-racial / colour-blind / diversity-through-tokenism thing that keeps the white racial frame in place.

It is a mindset, not a set of particular policies.

I cannot tell you what such a frame would be, I can only start thinking out loud about what it might contain, offered here for discussion:

  1. Liberty-and-justice frame. America is made great not by repeating the grand words of Jefferson, Lincoln and Martin Luther King, Jr, but by making them come true:
  2. Multiracial model of society: America does not belong to any one race but to everyone who lives there. Everyone should have equal rights and equal opportunity. Inequality, caused by racist policies and institutions, past and present, is what screws up American society, not the pathologies of people of colour.
  3. The oneness of mankind. “We are all God’s children”, as Christians would say.
  4. Wanda's Quilt of Many Colors 2011America is a coat of many colours – not a melting pot. White is just one colour of that coat, just one ethnic group. America is not “white with impurities”. Everyone is equally American. America was built and defended by the blood, sweat and tears of everyone.
  5. Multiracial is beautiful: America brings together people from all over the world to create something new. It represents the whole human race, not just part of it. That is part of its strength and beauty.
  6. The Multiracial Default. Nothing is truly American unless it represents all races. Tokenism is a joke. Eurocentrism and Afrocentrism are too limited. Listen to people of all races. Decisions made mainly by people of one race are limited in viewpoint and tend to favour that race, therefore:
  7. Multiracial power. Institutions work best when the people who run them look like America, not like some white millionaire’s club or white suburbia – institutions like Congress, the president’s cabinet, courts, juries, corporate boards, the press, the police, schools, etc.
  8. Stereotypes are false. They are based on the logical fallacy of confirmation bias. No group of millions of humans can possibly be reduced to a handful of stereotypes. People are not that simple. Everyone is an individual first and foremost.
  9. Different is just different – not threatening, opposite, exotic, pathological, bad or ew. No one race or ethnic group is a shining model for others. Accept people as they are.
  10. America is screwed up. It was born in slavery and genocide and built on racism. It does not even work properly any more for most white people. The past cannot be changed, but it can be faced up to and made right by making America a land of equality for everyone.

– Abagond, 2013.

1011174_10151737732672975_412693126_n

Photograph of the Lovings by Grey Villet

Thanks to commenter Jefe for suggesting this post.

See also:

Read Full Post »

counter-frames

03B39060

Disclaimer: This post is based on the chapter of the same name in “The White Racial Frame” (2010) by White American sociologist Joe R, Feagin. 

Counter-frames are those that counter the White racial frame in America. They give Americans a way of looking at themselves and their society outside of White racism.

White sociologist Joe R. Feagin says there are five main counter-frames:

jefferson

Thomas Jefferson

Liberty-and-justice frame – Used by Whites to overthrow the British. It is expressed in the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution and the Gettysburg Address. Freedom, equality and justice for all – regardless of race. Most Americans hold this frame, but use it in different ways. Blacks, Natives and anti-racist Whites take it seriously. Most Whites only give it lip service: they will say that society should not give advantages to one race over another, but will not give up White privilege or support policies that threaten it, like busing, affirmative action, reparations or treaty rights. This is the main frame used by anti-racist Whites, like abolitionists and civil rights reformers.

du-bois

W.E.B. Du Bois

Black American counter-frame – Used by Blacks to live in a country that constantly dehumanizes them. Strongly anti-racist. Features:

  • Anti-racism
  • Liberty-and-justice frame
  • Whites as hypocritical
  • Stereotypes are false
  • Black is beautiful
  • Black power
  • Afrocentricity
ap7303100148

Russell Means

Native American counter-frame – Almost the same as the Black counter-frame. Like Blacks:

  • Natives have dealt with Whites for hundreds of years.
  • Whites have torn them from their land and went out of their way to destroy their families and cultures.
  • Natives have the same issues of police brutality, racial profiling, bad schools, weak civil rights protection, high rates of poverty and crime, etc.

Features:

  • Anti-racism
  • Liberty-and-justice frame
  • Whites as hypocritical, dangerous and untrustworthy
  • Stereotypes are false
  • Red is beautiful (not called that)
  • Red power
  • Treaty rights
  • Whites as despiritualizing the universe just as they dehumanize people of colour.
  • UN’s Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples
richard-aoki

Richard Aoki

Asian American counter-frame – Most Asians are first and second generation Americans. That means many have a strong home-culture frame that they can use instead of (or along with) the White racial frame. Apart from Japanese Americans, their counter-frames tend to be weakly anti-racist. Not because they do not experience racism, but because many do not have a long history of dealing with Whites like Blacks and Natives do. Lacking a strong anti-racist counter-frame makes it hard to stand up to racism, cowing many of them into accepting much of the White racial frame and White folkways, becoming, in effect, honorary Whites.

gutierrez

José Ángel Gutiérrez

Latino American counter-frame – much like Asian Americans, many are first or second generation Americans with a strong home-culture frame they can lean on and without a long history of racism to inform them. Apart from Chicanos (Mexican Americans), their counter-frames are weakly anti-racist. Many Latinos, especially middle and upper-class ones, assimilate and accept the White racial frame and White folkways. Others present themselves as “White Hispanics” – White by race, Hispanic by culture, being careful to distance themselves from Blacks while hanging onto most of their culture. There is a strong anti-racist Chicano counter-frame that is much like the Black and Native ones.

See also:

Read Full Post »

The black counter-frame

huey-freeman

The black counter-frame (1600s- ) is the set of ideas, images, narratives, history and so on through which many Black Americans see and understand America. According to white sociologist Joe R. Feagin, it is what counters the white racial frame among blacks.

  • The white racial frame is spread to blacks through white-controlled spaces: public school, white universities, the mass media.
  • The black counter-frame is spread through black-controlled spaces: family, friends, church, beauty salons, barber shops, bars, HBCUs, etc.

Some blacks use only the white racial frame, like Clarence Thomas or Uncle Ruckus of the “The Boondocks”. Some use only the black counter-frame, like Rev. Wright or Huey Freeman. Most blacks fall somewhere in between. There is no hive mind.

Even the black counter-frame itself is not the same from person to person, but these elements frequently appear:

  1. We are all God’s children. The common humanity of all people regardless of race. No one race is better than another. Therefore:
  2. Freedom, equality and justice for all! Straight out of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. What America should be, but not what it is:
  3. The main thing wrong with America is white racism. Whites do not live up to their political ideas of freedom, equality and justice. They talk the talk but do not even try to walk the walk. They got rich off of slavery and genocide. America was built on racism. Still is.
  4. Blacks are every bit as American as whites. The country was built on their blood, sweat and tears.
  5. Moral outrage. See above.
  6. Radicalism. America can and should be changed from within, through protest, revolution, etc. There is no such thing as Magical Progress. Nothing is going to change unless blacks do something. Thus: slave uprisings, abolitionists, John Brown, NAACP, SNCC, Black Panthers, etc.
  7. The stereotypes are not true. They are self-serving lies made up by white people.
  8. Black is beautiful. Blacks are fully and beautifully human, every bit as good as whites or anyone else. Black pride to counter the black shame taught by the white racial frame. Valuing black beauty, courage, achievement, etc.
  9. How to deal with white people. At work, at school, at government offices, etc. How to deal with the police. How to deal with white ideas of beauty. Sharing experiences of racism.
  10. Gendered racism. Racism affects males and females differently. Whites see black men as dangerous, black women as ugly yet oversexed. Mammy, Jezebel, Sapphire and Welfare Queen stereotypes. Black women get hit with both racism and sexism.
  11. Afrocentricity. To counter the blind Eurocentrism of Western culture.

Some who have clearly expressed a black counter-frame at length:

  • 1820s: David Walker (“The Appeal”)
  • 1830s:
  • 1840s: Henry Garnet
  • 1850s: Martin Delany, Frederick Douglass (especially his Fourth of July speech)
  • 1860s:
  • 1870s:
  • 1880s: Ida B. Wells-Barnett, Anna Julia Cooper
  • 1890s:
  • 1900s: W.E.B. Du Bois (“The Souls of Black Folk”)
  • 1910s:
  • 1920s:
  • 1930s: Oliver Cox
  • 1940s:
  • 1950s: CORE
  • 1960s: Stokely Carmichael and Charles Hamilton (“Black Power”)
  • 1970s:
  • 1980s:
  • 1990s:
  • 2000s: Jeremiah Wright

– Abagond, 2013.

Source: Joe R. Feagin, “The White Racial Frame” (2010).

See also:

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »