The Herero and Nama genocide (1904-1908) was carried out by Germany in South West Africa, now called Namibia. It killed 60,000 Hereros and 10,000 Nama, 50% to 70% of them. It featured concentration camps, skin-and-bone people, mass graves, medical experiments and good German record-keeping – more than 30 years before the Jewish Holocaust.
People who blame the Jewish Holocaust on Hitler and the Nazis alone need to think again: Germany showed itself to be a genocidal nation when Hitler was just 15.
There is no guesswork about this being a genocide: we have the orders, the letters and the diaries that leave no doubt that the Germans meant to wipe out the Herero and Nama and take their land. It was not just a case of a general gone mad or a war gone wrong.
In the late 1800s there were 80,000 Herero and 20,000 Nama. Both had land and they herded cows. The Herero were Bantu and lived in the middle of Namibia, the Nama were Khoisan (Hottentots) and lived to the south. They were armed with rifles.
The Germans were badly outnumbered and outgunned. They were in constant fear of an uprising, which in turn put the Herero in constant fear that war was about to break out. And so it did in 1904.
At first the Herero were winning: the Germans were not just outgunned, but the governor was away in the south fighting the Nama.
Germany, afraid of losing face, sent General Lothar von Trotha with men, cannons and machine guns – weapons the Herero had no defence against.
The Herero were defeated and massacred at the Battle of Waterberg. Most Herero escaped and fled across the desert to British Bechuanaland (Botswana), men, women, children and cows. The German army pursued. Only 1,000 Herero made it across the border to British territory. The rest died of thirst or were gunned down by the Germans. It was senseless and gruesome but when questioned Von Trotha said he wanted their “total extermination”.
Von Trotha was a dark angel of Darwin:
Where the climate allows the white man to work, philanthropic views cannot banish Darwin’s law “Survival of the Fittest”.
The Nama were next. They fought a hit-and-run guerrilla war. The Germans fought back by burning down all their houses and granaries.
About 17,000 Herero and Nama, some half-white, were sent to concentration camps along the coast, like Shark Island. They were forced to build the Otavi railroad – men, women and children, underfed, some skin and bones, raped and whipped, worked till they dropped. Conditions were so terrible almost half never made it out of the camps alive.
Those who lived through the genocide were tattooed and forced to wear an identity badge around their necks. Their movements were controlled by the government. With land and livestock gone they had little choice but to work for Germans in the new racial hierarchy.
And yet still the Germans feared them.
A hundred years later Germany apologized but did not think they owed the Herero and Nama anything more than their fine words.
Source: “Forgotten Genocides” (2011), edited by Rene Lemarchand
See also:
- genocide
- How to deny a genocide
- Armenian genocide – about ten years later
- Scramble for Africa – what the genocide was part of
- human zoos – big in Germany at this time
- Sarah Baartman – a Khoisan woman
- An Open Letter to King Leopold II
- black people according to the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica – educated American opinion of the time
- Philippine-American War – how America took over the Philippines just years before. Features massacres, camps, naked racism but not explicit genocide
Reblogged this on innerstanding isness and commented:
The Herero and Nama genocide
LikeLike
Wow… YOU REALLY RILE ME UP!!! TRUTH HURTS. Keep peeling back the layers. It is appreciated. Thank you Abagond.
LikeLike
Now I’m intrigued; what is it about 17th-20th century European culture to have caused them to go bat$hit-crazy-killer-ape? On day I will trek into Darkest Deutschland to discover the root of this misanthropic pathology.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Being German this horrifies me more than you could realize. I remember being pretty young (probably 3 or 4) and my grandmother told me stories about the Hottentots. But unlike most German stories, the Hottentots she talked about weren’t “boogeymen” that came to “get” bad children. She told me that they were people who had things that the Kaiser wanted, like land and cows. She said there was a big fight and Kaiser sent all his men with guns to shot all the Hottentots. She told me this was a very bad thing and that her father went to France because he was a solider and didn’t want go far away and kill Hottentots. I asked my father about this years and years ago, because I didn’t know if I remembered what she told me correctly. He said that my great-grandfather did sneak off to France rather than get sent to Africa. He strongly disagreed w/ how the natives were being treated and thought that Kaiser Wilhelm II was a greedy, war monger.
I’m lucky to come from a family with a strong conscience. Did they protest what was happening to the Herero and Nama? No. But my great-grandfather left Germany and his family rather than do something he knew was wrong. I respect him for that.
Having just reread what I’ve written (I often have spelling issues), I hope this story doesn’t come across as flippant or dismissive, for it was definitely not meant as such! I was not trying to belittle the gruesome genocide of the Herero and Nama by saying that since my family didn’t personally participate it somehow made it okay.
LikeLiked by 2 people
@ Jenn
Thanks for sharing your experience 🙂
LikeLike
Given Germany’s history it’s safe to say that Germany is definitely a troubled nation.
LikeLike
DESPICABLE moment in history. How funny it is that we don’t get the history of the Herero massacre in our contemporary history classes – high school or university. White revisionism at its finest. They have no trouble milking the African as weak, barbaric, disease-ridden ‘other’ archtype, but when it comes to whites in contemporary history books you are either a victim of the nazis or you are not a victim of the nazis. When it comes to German victims, the ally soldiers, Jews are the only sufferers.
And history should only recall that bleak moment in extremity and racist animus until we get to the next genocide, the African on African genocide (Rwanda, Somalia, Democratic Republic of Congo etc.) Contemporary tellings of history have a funny way of fastforwarding, slow motioning and then fastforwarding again when it conveniences Canadians/Americans/W.Europeans. They love to skip the innumerable points in history when white = evil. It allows them to sleep at night.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for this post Aba.
People often forget the horrors of colonization in Africa. There was nothing pretty, good or christian about it. It was a dominant culture believing they were superior and entitled to Africa’s natural and vast resources simply because they were white and more technologically advanced.
Funny thing is if you go to Namibia right now the whites control 80% of that economy most of whom are of German descent. Hell, the capital Windhoek looks bloody German/European. The blacks? Overglorified slaves in THEIR OWN country.
This is what makes me angry when i see some white posters on here being dismissive of OUR history. Its ours. We learn about yours, why should we sweep ours under the rag esp since we suffer from the effects of your war mongering ancestors to this day???
LikeLiked by 2 people
Is it sad the part where Germany actually recognized it’s genocide surprised me? Germany is just so mum about practically it’s entire history that hearing them fess up is kind of a shock.
LikeLike
I grew up in Sweden, a country that shares alot of it’s history with Germany and the rest of Europe. But it’s never talked about how popular the ideas of white (Arian rather) Supremacy were, on the whole continent really! Even the royals dabbled in it.
When we were taught history in School it was completely avoided. It was never explained how Swedes had been apart of the “movement” from inception. This is probably the reason Germans love vacationing here.
There is perhaps a sense of kinship because even if the average Swede knows nothing of this the average German knows enough to feel safe coming here. Heck,our Queen is half-german!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wow! This is just like the jewish holocoust. Thanks for the knowledge.
LikeLike
In 500 years, Black folks will just be a fairy tale White folks tell their kids to get them to behave.
LikeLike
Yes, thanks for this information, Abagond…
LikeLike
It is amazing how much people wilfully forget or neglect to tell later generations. How deep we must dig to learn everything. Who is ever taught about such a genocide during an education in the western world? I wonder if the average White westerner would view racialised people differently if they knew their history of colonisation more in depth?
LikeLike
@mary burrell
Interesting observation. There is a book about the Jewish Holocaust, “The Cunning of History” by Richard L. Rubinstein, that makes essentially that argument. The Jewish holocaust in Germany was not an abberration at all. Genocide was being carried out against “natives” all around the world. Western European nations had been clearing “undesirables” and “subhumans” out of their own ancestral lands for centuries. The only difference was that the Jewish Holocaust took place right there in Europe and the people who were slaughtered were German citizens. Given their genocidal history, everyone should be very, very nervous when white people start talking about human “overpopulation” and resource starvation. Hint: they are NOT talking about themselves. These ideas are as old as Malthus. And they are invariably promulgated by people who control more resources than they really need.
LikeLike
I didn’t know about this, It shows what can happen when one nation thinks of it’s self as the MASTER RACE. Mind you I think if Germany thought they could get away with it now they would do it again. It’s in their makeup.
LikeLike
You beat to me the BWE, and now this. I’ll probably write this one over at my place in after I finish my two week hiatus. The only thing disappoints me about this post (other than the word limit) is your tone. It’s almost as if you believe that the German people should feel sorry about genocide, instead of being proud to fu[k up a bwoy an tek weh him tings. Sometimes , people have things that you want, and well, they can’t be reasoned with. But you already knew that, I’m sure
LikeLike
This post just scratches the surface. Something I find chilling is how Germans did nothing to save their own half-black children. Instead these children became the object of scientific studies that supported a policy of killing them! How ice cold can you get?
LikeLike
@ Satanforce:
General Von Trotha noticed that too:
The Germans of the time were just so out there with their racism. There are tons of quotes I could have wallowed in but did not have the space for. Partly because Germans back then did not speak in soundbites either. I was doing good to work in that one Von Trotha quote about Darwin.
LikeLike
These events are most certainly horrible and reprehensible, but what surprises me is the lack of context within the greater historical narrative. Group A inflicts such atrocities on Group B with regularity.
The Bantu have been fast and slow-motion genociding the Khoi, San, and Pygmy peoples for a millenia, and it’s widely believed to persist to this very day, propelled by as virulently racist beliefs as you’ll find anywhere.
It’s interesting to read comments from European-descended people expressing historical guilt but rarely if ever any comments from African-descended people expressing historical guilt.
Why the disparity?
LikeLike
@ Randy
Thanks for giving an example of one of the main ways to deny a genocide:
LikeLike
@ Randy
You need to support that claim. It is not common knowledge.
LikeLike
@ Randy
Probably because, like the Neanderthal/Cro-Magnon scenario, this so-called genocide is, at best, an hypothesis?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bantu_expansion
The Herero genocide, on the other hand, is well documented.
It is important to stress that it is the only thing which sets this apart from other crimes against humanity committed during the colonial era. Similar campaigns of terror occurred regularly throughout all Africa, but were labeled under the euphemism of “pacification”.
For instance, the Mau Mau uprising in Kenya also saw the mass deportation of Kikuyu fighters to concentration camps. This happened less than 2 decades after WW II.
LikeLike
Abagond:
I’m not denying the Herero / Nama genocide at all, just trying to frame it within the broader sweep of history.
In the Democratic Republic of Congo alone there have been 5+ million deaths since the mid-1990s. In recent history you also have mass atrocities in Rwanda, Darfur, Liberia, Sierra Leone.
http://www.genocideintervention.net/educate/crisis/democratic_republic_of_congo/
What makes these 70,000 deaths more objectionable than that of say 5-6 million Congolese, many of whom suffered unspeakable crimes against humanity?
LikeLike
Abagond:
This is just a cursory survey of sources describing anti-pygmy discrimination.
“DRC: Displacement and discrimination – the lot of the Bambuti Pygmies”
http://www.irinnews.org/Report/90354/DRC-Displacement-and-discrimination-the-lot-of-the-Bambuti-Pygmies
———-
“Pygmies in Central Africa massacred by warring factions”
http://www.un.org/en/africarenewal/newrels/indigen.htm
According to Ms. Njuma Ekundanayo, a DRC government representative to the Forum specializing in pygmy issues, other Congolese see the pygmy people as sub-human. “Military tools today include rape, live burial and cannibalism, all aimed at extermination so that the perpetrators can have access to minerals and timber.”
———-
“Minorities under siege: Pygmies today in Africa”
http://www.irinnews.org/InDepthMain.aspx?InDepthId=9&ReportId=58647
According to Minority Rights Group International (MRG), such crimes against humanity continue. In addition, MRG stated that rebel groups in DRC deliberately target pygmy communities, who are considered “subhuman” or seen as beggars and thieves by other ethnic groups.
———–
“DR Congo pygmies appeal to UN”
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/2933524.stm
Sinafasi Makelo, a representative of Mbuti pygmies, told the UN’s Indigenous People’s Forum that during the four-year civil war his people had been hunted down and eaten.
[…]
“In living memory, we have seen cruelty, massacres, and genocide, but we have never seen human beings hunted down as though they were game animals,” he said.
“Pygmies are being pursued in the forests. People have been eaten. This is nothing more, nothing less, than a crime against humanity.”
[…]
Both sides in the war regard them as “subhuman”, and some say their flesh can confer magical powers.
———
“Pygmies in the Congo Basin and Conflict, by Raja Sheshadri”
http://www1.american.edu/ted/ice/pygmy.htm
In most countries of Central Africa Pygmies are not considered citizens and are refused identity cards, deeds to land, health care and proper schooling.
[…]
After being targeted by rampaging Interahamwe Hutu militias who sought out the creation an ethnically pure Rwanda by eliminating the all Tutsis and Pygmies, observers estimate that at least 10,000 Pygmies were killed with a further 10,000 forced to flee their homes, leaving that population at less then a third of what it was before 1994.
LikeLike
@ Randy
Whoever said otherwise?
You are:
1. Conflating genocide with other things so you can say it is common. Genocide is NOT common despite what racists WANT to believe.
2. You are deflecting – I suspect because the guilty party in this case is white.
LikeLike
What context would you put the Herero/Nama genocide and the Rwandan genocide then, Randy? Aren’t they both the direct outcome of a European pseudo-scientific base? I think your brush is sweeping very broadly indeed.
@ Bulanik,
Adeptly put!
LikeLike
@ Randy
What about the genocide against the Khoisan? I mean, this post was not about Pygmies.
LikeLike
Bulanik:
I would say these fall under:
– Competition for resources
– Statism
– Tribalism / Otherism based on perceived ancestral superiority manifested by military or technological disparity
This context covers documented intra-African “racism” (e.g. Bantu vs. Pygmy) as well as intra-European “racism” (e.g German vs. Slav).
LikeLike
@ Randy
Please stick to genocide.
LikeLike
@Bulanik Thank you very much for all your posts they are so informative.
@Randy The difference with this genocide Randy and the Rwandese genocide, Sierra Leone and Congo Wars is justice. Wasn’t Charles Taylor convicted? Wasn’t the Congolese general (forget his name) convicted by the ICC? Is that not what the ICC is for? Convict those evil genocidal Africans? Tell me who convicted the Germans? Do they still not benefit from the war of their ancestors economically? How is that justice? How many people know about this genocide and the various evil things Europeans did in Africa? Very few. Its a glossed over history. But every year here in Africa the Rwandese remember the genocide. Its evening news in East Africa every year. Did we forget? Never. Have you? No, as evidenced by every time a white commenter like you uses it as deflection.
I am sorry but you seem to be sweeping it under the rag by saying well they do it too. This isn’t about the war in Congo. Something millions of people around the world and countless organizations are involved in stopping. But what does it have to do with this post? Whats your point? Not one of your links have to do with the Herero people in Namibia.
Abagond please delete my previous comment. Commenting on phone is a mine field.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Genocide is rare. It is not “natural” – except to a racist. Tens of thousands of women and children of a particular race, religion or ethnicity do not just up and die by “accident”, not even in war. It is done on purpose, thought out in advance by sick minds.
LikeLike
abagond:
“How Africa Became Black”
http://discovermagazine.com/1994/feb/howafricabecameb331/
Thus linguistics tells us not only that the Pygmies and the Khoisan, who formerly ranged widely over the continent, were engulfed by blacks; it also tells us that the blacks who did the engulfing were Bantu speakers.
“The genetic legacy of western Bantu migrations”
http://dienekes.blogspot.com/2005/06/western-bantu-expansion.html
(paywall blocks access to the source doc)
This study reveals (1) a dramatic displacement of male and female Khoisan-speaking groups in the southwest, since both the maternal and the paternal genetic pools were composed exclusively by types carried by Bantu-speakers;
“Guns, Germs, and Steel”
http://www.humanjourney.us/gunsGerms4.html
They [Bantu] spread through most of sub-equatorial Africa and replaced, surrounded, and pushed south the other groups.
LikeLike
Amazing how the Military code that Kaiser Wilhelm created helped to foster acts of genocide.
LikeLike
@ Randy
I have lived much of my life in places that saw a dramatic displacement of male and female white groups in metropolitan New York, since both the maternal and the paternal genetic pools were composed exclusively by types carried by blacks. Does that mean there was a genocide?
LikeLike
Abagond:
I would contend against the “rare” claim. In just the past 20 years in Africa there were genocides in Rwanda, Darfur, Congo, Sierra Leone, and probably other smaller-scale events which a bit of research could uncover.
LikeLike
Abagond:
No, since there doesn’t appear to be the additional criteria of forced displacement, killing, causing bodily / mental harm, or creating conditions which would bring about the above.
LikeLike
Bulanik:
Whether or not one considers such an event a “genocide” by modern definition depends on intent. Were those killed just in the wrong place at the wrong time, or were they deliberately targeted due to group (national, racial, ethnic, religious) affiliation?
Bulanik:
It was a meta-observation about the manner in which genocides are discussed, and the opinions that people (both in-group and out-group) have towards the perpetrators.
I’ve observed that the level of accountability accepted / demanded of perpetrators correlates to the race of the perpetrators.
If such a meta-discussion is off topic, then I apologize and will continue on the open thread for those interested.
LikeLike
ow. I don’t think that I’ll be writing about the Hereros. I think I ‘ll be writing about his guy instead. I think I know who I want to be like when I grow up.
LikeLike
Bulanik,
I think my challenge about double-standards is a reasonable one. If people think that the race of perpetrator should influence accountability then let’s have that discussion. If not, then an encompassing theory should be developed to include the full spectrum of group-on-group atrocities without introducing contradictions.
Whatever one might say about the nature of Europeans who enslaved and genocided Africans can surely be said of Africans who enslaved and genocided fellow Africans.
Perhaps someone can explain how the dehumanization of Africans by Europeans is morally different from the dehumanization of the Pygmy by the Bantu, or the dehumanization of the Twa by the Hutu and Tutsi.
Again, I’ll move this meta-discussion if it’s OT.
LikeLike
@ Randy
It did not seem like meta-observation or challenging double standards to me. It seemed more like a deflection of the old “blacks do it too” sort. Maybe I missed something but I do not remember anyone saying or implying that those who carry out genocide should be held to a different standard according to their race.
I was going to do a post on this genocide sooner or later. I did it now to follow the human zoo post to help make the point that that sort of dehumanization was not harmless. It opens the way for just this sort of thing.
LikeLike
Abagond:
Black people should not be shocked by this. Wicked folk may hide the truth, but, they can’t hide it forever.
Tyrone
LikeLike
Why is it that white people ONLY hold blacks to the same standard, when it comes to downplaying the bad things whites have done?
LikeLike
@Franklin
Good question.
I guess it’s part of fearing white guilt. They don’t want to be known as people who are capable of something so vile. So, they point the finger at other groups, especially black people, and say “Look! They’ve done it too.” And the old “black crime” excuse is the usual avoidance of shame.
LikeLike
It seems almost blasphemous to white people to know from their victims that they have a problem.
LikeLike
Linda says,
No, Randy, your challenge is not reasonable.
If you truly were as objective as you claim to be, you would acknowledge this historical event for what it is and stop bringing up incidents that have absolutely nothing to do with the colonization of Namibia by Germany and the murder that was committed.
The Germans used the Herero and Nama as guinea pigs to advance their supremacist theories. They also did this a few years later with the Jews and other people in the concentrations camps.
The German’s are held accountable by the Jews and the rest of the World til this day for the atrocities that were committed in WW2. The Germans publically took responsibility and financially compensated (reparations) the Jews, and until this day, Germany continues to subsidize projects for Israel and also sends compensation for items such as stolen personal property or other various claims against Germany by Jewish victims.
http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/israel-pressuring-germany-jewish-ghetto-workers-still-waiting-for-money-a-742577.html
http://www.thelocal.de/money/20091023-22775.html
So, yes, it is very reasonable to expect that the world should also hold the Germans accountable for the atrocities they committed in Africa in the name of expansionism and race supremacy.
To be fair, the Germans did offer compensation back in 2005 but the Germans did not want the compensation package to be called “reparations”, they wanted it called “reconciliation initiative”–so they were willing to pay but did not want to be publicly held accountable for the genocide committed–even though their atrocities are documented Facts.
http://www.namibian.com.na/index.php?id=28&tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=13300&no_cache=1
LikeLike
This is a very interesting blog. I’m glad I came across it. This type of post is so necessary. This is hidden history. It helps to explain a lot when it is uncovered. However, that’s A LOT to read with all the comments ! But I’ll try to find time…
LikeLike
Well, absolutly, we white people have to be able to look at this and the other systematic actions that were done on a large scale , without fear and guilt, but absolute horror and a realisation that holding on to “whiteness” is what is going to continue in some way this horror. And, we have to not need to compare it to diminish it.
We have to look into the eyes of that general and realise its the same eyes as the klansman, and the eyes of white people grinning at a lynching, and feel disgust over that and a resolution to expell this attachment to a “race” and a ” color”, and know we are responsible for creating this racial codification and are forcing everyone else to have to play it too, and, defend themselves from it
Others peoples story is other peoples story and is independant and we all have to look in the mirror anyway, but, there are aspects of this racial dynamic that really need to be confronted and let go of as white people, exactly because the ones holding on to it are holding us back as people, not building us up
LikeLike
Abagond:
I am not seeking to deflect at all. Truly these were undeniably horrible events. However, if you read the comments above (and others from similar posts), you’ll see implications that these events suggest a particular character of either culture or race. Numerous commenters have alleged that racism is the invention of Europeans, and one commenter in this thread suggesting that racism was invented by the Catholic Church.
Tell that to the Pygmy.
The “blacks do it too” argument, as you’ve called it, serves to illustrate that such behaviors are common human behaviors, and are most accurately understood as such.
In the same manner, the production milk is not a peculiar characteristic of cows, but of the broader mammalia class.
LikeLike
B R I am 100% on the same line and I’ll say it: it feels good to find people who think in the same direction as I do.
LikeLike
Bulanik:
I’m not familiar with these negative associations of the name Bantu, and am not using them as such. Rather, I think the Bantu migration historical event serves to expose what I perceive to be double standards with regards to moral behavior.
If European-descended peoples are expected to acknowledge, disavow, and remediate “white privilege” based upon a history of supremacy, then why shouldn’t Bantu-descended people also be expected to acknowledge, disavow, and remediate “Bantu privilege” based upon a history of supremacy?
LikeLike
Linda,
Do you propose that all ethnic / national groups who have committed atrocities pay reparations, or only the Germans?
LikeLike
B R And I even suggest that as light-skinned people who do not share the “white”-mindedness of our look-alikes, we deny them the right of labeling us “whites”, as this is and has been and was meant to be a political statement (and therefore entered in the laws of Virginia and the Code Noir of Louis XIV as a legal fact that the opposite of “white”, “black” meant slave for live and forever) with all kinds of implications. This kind of stance is rarely if never reflected in mainstream literature, on the web or elsewhere, but I think we need to impose it as a reaction to this too-long-lasting theory of races that has lead to the destruction of so many peoples and their cultures.
Watch this. When I saw it, I was so glad, so glad someone (Walter Mosley) with such talent would say the things I think in such a powerful way: http://vimeo.com/21501057
LikeLike
Bulanik:
Another lacuna in my knowledge is that I don’t know what “lacuna” means. As for the Bantu, my understanding of them is as a tribal / linguistic group, not as pejorative term.
Bulanik:
The evidence regarding the displacement of Khoi, San, and Pygmy peoples by Bantu peoples during the Bantu Migrations seems conclusive, but if that assessment is erroneous I’m open to hearing counter-evidence. However, the modern abuse and dehumanization of Pygmy peoples by Bantu peoples is quite well documented.
As for equating “like-for-like” as you mention, you seem to be implying that forced displacement, discrimination, dehumanization, and genocides are somehow less immoral if performed by perpetrators who originate from a land mass contiguous with that of the origination point of the victims.
How does that make it any better?
Regarding the comment about Hitler, the issue was whether or not the term “racism” only applies between peoples who are classified as being different races by the common western definition, or if it can apply between peoples who have different tribal / ethnic affiliations but would still be classified within the same broad “race”. And yes, the original problem was a failure of reading comprehension.
Also, Godwin’s Law.
LikeLike
“Randy
Linda,
Do you propose that all ethnic / national groups who have committed atrocities pay reparations, or only the Germans?”
Linda says,
Randy, your closed-ended question is loaded and designed to further feed whatever reason you have to actually not discuss this post as it pertains to Germany’s colonization of Namibia.
You are being disingenous by speaking about intra-African ethnic conflicts, as well as belittling a historical event that shaped a Nation.
As Bulanik pointed out, European tribal Ethnic groups also had conflicts leading one group to subjugate the other with mass murders being committed.
And as you can see, Bulanik took a bite out of your carrot and posted reparatons and loser’s fees paid out by various European countries.
If you truly want to do a Tit-for-Tat, then you should bring up genocidal events committed by Africans after they invaded and colonized a European country and exterminated more than half of that European countries population…that’s comparable.
LikeLike
@ Randy
As I stated earlier, the “bantou genocide” theory, like the Neanderthal/Cro-Magnon scenario, is just a hypothesis. There is not a single material evidence to support it. Ironically, the very links you posted do not support your claim, as Bulanik demonstrated. And apparently you did not get Abagond’s sarcasm when he mentioned “dramatic displacement of male and female white groups in metropolitan New York”… Linguistic influences do not necessary imply genocide.
You also posted links about alleged acts of cannibalism against pygmies during the war in Congo. Despite what the hundred of thousand links discussing this ad nauseam all over the net might lead you to think, said allegations turned out to be fake and were officially refuted years ago:
http://www.irinnews.org/printreport.aspx?reportid=51346
At the time, a press conference was held, attended by some of the pygmies who were supposed to have been eaten. It did not stop the story from circulating, mind you. As far as Africa is concerned, the more gruesome the story, the more believable it is, it seems.
By the way, not long ago, Bulanik and I had a discussion on the open thread about how the western media were quick to apply the g-word to any African conflict. White folks seem to have a hard time maintaining their objectivity when it comes to their beloved “Dark Continent”:
http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1155
LikeLike
@ Randy
To read the Bantu Expansion as genocide without any proof is to read your own genocidal racism into it.
LikeLike
abagond:
Admittedly, that claim is a bit of a stretch, though not an unreasonable assumption given the evidence. Even if you leave that aside, the current “racism” against the Pygmy by Bantu peoples is well documented, as is “Bantu Privilege”, so I believe the general principle stands.
LikeLike
@randy:
Don’t be so childish, man. One would think that being a proud white racist you would be proud of these achievements instead of whining and makin up imagined stories about “bantu” conspiracies.
The thing is: ever since the romans, white eurasian cultures have been racist and warlike, and this combination created a culture of genocides as part of normal power plays or practises of war.
The romans had a three strikes rule: they conquered, you could try to rebel once, but if you did it twice, they tried to wipe you out. Not just you, but your whole friggin culture too (jews and dacians for example, dacians they wiped out completely).
Attila the Hun did not do that. He simply absorbed conquered people into his hunnic empire. And he was not a nice guy at all but he was not a racist.
In the medieval times genocides were normal way of war. Killing off an entire town or village or people by starving and destruction was sometimes achieved but many more times attempted. Just look at how Charles the Great treated his eastern neighbours or how germans did later in the east, or how Edward “The Hammer of Scotts” treated Scotland and Ireland, how Robert the Bruce treated northern England, how the english and the french behaved during 100 years war etc.
Once these guy went abroad, to conquer new lands, they had one thing in mind: we take what ever we want and kill everything in our way. The results are well known.
From those first “white colonists” who usually were mercenaries, robbers and criminals, religious zelost like the taleban today, grew up a certain way to handle the rest of the world. It became normal to kill and do basically what ever they wanted to do. From Pizzarro to king Lepolds Congo there is a straight line. It began with few hundred ruthless bastards who were ready to kill the popes and emperors of other cultures if need be and ended with compelx racial theories which gave a reason to that behavior.
Think about this: the britts thoughed that it was ok to sell drugs to the chinese despite what the chinese government was thinking. And when the chinese tried to stop that, result was the Opium war. A war in which the brittish drug lords along with the birttish monarch were defending the rights for free drug trade in China. How would americans think if the mexican and columbian drug cartels woyuld send gunboats up the Potomac and shoot White house and Capitol just because USA tries to stop them from selling dope?
This is the core, the Thing. Racial theories came later when they no longer could say back home that: oh we found this city of gold and killed the locals and took the gold. They had to create divine reason, an explanation for this type of behavior. They still do. It is now called “democracy” and “freedom”.
And if anyone thinks that this has gone away, think again: in Vietnam US killed some 1 000 000 vietnamese “dinks” ans “slanteyes”. In Irak USA has killed 200-350 000 “rag heads”. No one knows how many has been killed in Afganistan. In the ethnic clensing orgy in Bosnia back in early 1990’s some 300 000 people lost their lives. Just like that, while rest of the Europe was eating macdonalds and watching Premier League soccer.
That is who we are. It is not them. It is us. It is our culture of power. Our religious traditions. Racial theories which, like we see in randy and others, pop up even after all thats being said. We are The Barbarians.
Those germans killings jews during WW2 were not all specially trained and selected SS men. One police batallion which killed 38 000 jews in Poland was a composite of normal reservists from Hamburg area. Oldest were in their 40’s and youngest just below 20. They were teachers, beggars, policemen, office workers, manual laborers etc. Even after their commander told them that if any one does not want to participate in the massacers there will be no punishment, only 5 guys out of 800 stepped out and in the end only 2 guys did not take part in any of the “actions”. 2 out of 800. Everybody else did it.
And they were just normal white european reservists. Just like me.
LikeLike
@ Sam
Nice to see you back.
@ Bulanik
Nothing new under the sun, eh?
LikeLike
Bulanik,
Your referencing of Hitler in this thread has nothing to do with a connections between Germans and genocides and everything to do with ad-hom bashing against me. Your dissembling is unbecoming. And yes, you’re still misreading that point, which in this discussion is OT.
LikeLike
[…] The Herero and Nama Genocide […]
LikeLike
@ Randy
Bulanik and others, but Bulanik in particular, have thoroughly demolished any pretence of a, so called, “double standard” argument you could make here. Its cynical and disingenuous on your part. And, as Bulanik has correctly highlighted, a re-hash of a previous speculative argument you tried to have with me. Go back and read your own comments here:
Admit it you’ve been exposed as the arrogant, non-empathetic racist you are. But you won’t. You would do well to listen to some of the comments left by B.R & Sam on this thread. But again you won’t. In the end my friend it is you who has experienced:
I’m just saying…
Oh…and I don’t have Bantu heritage. I hope we’ve cleared that up! Funny how you concede ignorance about the usage of this term in pre- Apartheid South Africa. But then again is it really?
LikeLike
Bulanik,
Your attempt to put words in my mouth is disappointing, inaccurate, and fallacious. You’re again resorting to ad-hominem attacks instead of addressed substantive questions.
Allow me to re-ask a choice one:
As for equating “like-for-like” as you mention, you seem to be implying that forced displacement, discrimination, dehumanization, and genocides are somehow less immoral if performed by perpetrators who originate from a land mass contiguous with that of the origination point of the victims.
How does that make it any better?
Kwamla,
Bulanik hasn’t addressed the double-standard question above, you haven’t addressed my last double-standard question to you, found here:
https://abagond.wordpress.com/open-thread/#comment-139801
LikeLike
@ Randy
Let me ask you this: Do you think there is a scale of evil or are all evil acts on the same level?
LikeLike
I’m somewhere between 17-27 years old and I JUST heard about this last year. American high schools give a severely edited version of African colonialism.
LikeLike
SomeGuy: Let me ask you this: Do you think there is a scale of evil or are all evil acts on the same level?
Despite the term having varying definitions, I think it’s safe to say that acts which are commonly classified as “evil” do manifest across a scale of severity.
LikeLike
I really enjoyed this documentary about Namibia’s fight for independence from South Africa’s apartheid government.
I believe that til this day Namibia is still about 2% white.
LikeLike
@Randy
There is no double standard to address. Even though you have resorted to try every trick in the book to fabricate one. Its a delusion and its in your head! And it has been throughout and comprehensively shown to be so in this thread.
Your need and want to find a so called “double standard” emanates from your incapacity to understand and appreciate that racism perpetuates: Inequality and Injustice
Further, you have shown your mindset to operate from a false “equal and opposite” definition of racism – Group A commits acts of racism, Group B commits similar acts of racism. Group A acts of racism-=Group B acts of equal but opposite racism.This is the false equation which persists in your head.
Historical accounts like: The Herero and Nama genocide and many, many others , discussed here and elsewhere on Abagond’s blog, show up this grossly misleading idea of a racial double standard.
Which is why the more you insist in perpetuating this idea that the imposition of inequality and injustice on Group A does not exist the clearer you reveal yourself to be the die-hard racist you are.
Ask yourself why you seem unconcerned to address this point?
And just to repeat once again…since you’ve proven yourself prone to deficiency in your reading skills – There is no double standard question to address!!!
LikeLike
Kwamla:
The discriminatory and dehumanizing manifestations of racism by Europeans towards Africans seems matched nearly point-for-point by that of Bantu-related Africans against the Pygmy.
How are the Herero and Nama genocides any more immoral than corresponding genocides against forest peoples by other Africans?
Answering that question is necessary to quash the suggestion of a double-standard.
The least racist umbrella opinion, which happens to be the one I’m advancing, is that all groups of people have roughly the same proclivities and capacities to commit tribalistic atrocities against one another. That belief doesn’t redeem such acts in any way, but rather it provides a more truthful understanding of human nature.
LikeLike
@ Randy
“…The discriminatory and dehumanizing manifestations of racism by Europeans towards Africans seems matched nearly point-for-point by that of Bantu-related Africans against the Pygmy…”
Randy this is just pure utter ignorance on your part. In the light of everything thats already been said in this thread I’m actually embarrassed to continue debating this point with you!
LikeLike
Kwamla:
How do those events show up my “grossly misleading” idea?
LikeLike
@Bulanik
Already watched it last year, but thank you for the suggestion anyway. I love documentaries
LikeLike
“Randy this is just pure utter ignorance on your part. In the light of everything thats already been said in this thread I’m actually embarrassed to continue debating this point with you!”
*****
LOLOL !!!!!
Yeah, Kwamla. There comes a time when even well mannered racists – like Randy – should be abandoned and left alone…
The TRUTH could be plainly written on their collective faces, and they still wouldn’t see it (or admit to seeing it). It’s a spiritual/pathological consequence of being totally absorbed into the ways of whiteness – and the white racial frame.
LikeLike
@ Matari
I agree. This is sad but unfortunately so true for people in Randy’s case.. The acronym DBR comes to mind!
LikeLike
Kwamla,
It’s disappointing that you make the effort to comment but do not actually contribute any information.
Stating a belief in your own correctness is not “debating”. Offering arguments to support a claim is “debating”.
We’re waiting…
LikeLike
@ Randy
But your information, which was countered here:
…was refuted (and predictably ignored by you). So why are you even in this thread and peddling the same nonsense? It’s obvious that you’re just trying to hide the fact that you’re now flailing, and are trying to goad people into creating a new argument for you to hook on to. All so you can drag out this thread by arguing about something that is “slightly related but still overwhelmingly irrelevant” to the topic at hand.
LikeLike
Kwamla,
It’s disappointing that you make the effort to comment but do not actually contribute any information.
Stating a belief in your own correctness is not “debating”. Offering arguments to support a claim is “debating”.
We’re waiting…
”
”
”
@ Randy,
Kwamla might also respond to that:
It is disappointing that you use an obvious capacity for intellectual thought to deny, dispute, and minimize what Black people tell you: the experiences of Black men and women.
It is exactly what they are telling you it is. You can either try and reconcile that with the very obvious bias that you have in your own personal compilation of data or you can acknowledge that you are entirely unschooled in this reality and thus can concede ignorance in good conscience.
So far you have been doing option a) – why don’t you give option b) a try.
LikeLike
We’re waiting…
I’m glad someone is!
LikeLike
@ Randy
I find it surreal that of all the places you could have chosen to make your stand of “blacks do it too” you would choose D.R. Congo – the scene of the greatest horrors of white rule. To quote a page that Dahoman X linked to:
And, of course, as a Good White Person, you believe that Belgian misrule of D.R. Congo and Rwanda has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with the continuing horrors there – even after it was spelled out for you. It is just Mere Coincidence. Because everyone is a genocidal racist like you. Just part of the human condition, not of something profoundly sick and fucked up.
Whites are all about power but not responsibility, as your comments show. They would rather DEFLECT threads that talk about the sick evil shit they do in the world. All in the name of Properly Framing History, of course.
LikeLike
@ Randy
And I suppose it is also Mere Coincidence that the people who wiped out half or more of the Herero and Nama in Namibia would later wipe out half or more of the Jews and Gypsies of Europe. Because everyone is a genocidal racist like you. Just part of the human condition, not of something profoundly sick and fucked up. It is “natural” to kill people – men, women and children – who are “different” than you. How nice.
LikeLike
For sure , outside forces looking for raw minerals like copper to run the sound systems and computors we all are using , is driving the conflicts we see in places like the Congo.
There should be some kind of international referendum that would try to deal with this….how , I dont know , but, it seems that the huge corportate profits off the backs of people working like slavery and dying in the conflicts over the rich mineral wealth, could be somehow directed to put an end to slavery and murder over these minerals.
When powers only come in to strip down raw minerals and not buy finished goods , its always a losing situation for those who are being exploited for their labor and dying because of the struggles for the power over these raw minerals….Now its bigger than the West, China is a big player also in this….
LikeLike
Abagond:
My meta-comment in this thread was about the differences in accountability assumed / demanded of groups committing atrocities being based on the race of the perpetrator. Several of your commenters offered corroboration to my assumption. This thread and the 13,000 years of African History thread offered a glimpse into this racially-biased mindset.
I do apologize for the distraction. I have tremendous respect for the opportunity you give people to discuss these topics and do not wish to abuse the privilege.
LikeLike
Abagond:
Something being “natural” doesn’t preclude it from being considered “sick” by common morality.
Acknowledging this does not mean that one shouldn’t fight what is considered “evil”. I would offer that to fight something effectively, you must understand it completely. Thus my continued perseverance to uncover fallacies and double-standards.
Abagond:
Not coincidence, but not unique either.After all, the Bible recounts the Jews themselves committing genocides against the Midianites, Amelekites, and Canaanites. The wheel turns and turns.
LikeLike
@ Randy
Yet somehow, despite the supposedly genocidal nature of man, Jews, though despised and hated, lived for over a thousand years in the heart of Europe. Genocide is the exception, not the rule.
LikeLike
Something being “natural” doesn’t preclude it from being considered “sick” by common morality.
Don’t forget, being homicidal, suicidal and an all round maniac is ‘natural’ also. Try it you’ll like it folks!
Acknowledging this does not mean that one shouldn’t fight what is considered “evil”.
Yes, I am a homicidal, genocidal maniac. Whenever I’m out shopping and there is a fabulous sale on(50-70% off), I feel like slaughtering the other shoppers all over the place and systematically, so I can ensure I am the only one who can enjoy future sales! When out on a lousy date, I want to murder the sucker for having wasted my time. Do I want to fight these ‘natural’ impulses? What for? They are natural and should therefore be indulged in and enjoyed! Now where is my bazooka and grenades?
I would offer that to fight something effectively, you must understand it completely.
Nothing to understand, genocide is ‘inherent’ and ‘natural’ , just give into your natural impulses folks.
Thus my continued perseverance to uncover fallacies and double-standards..
Thus and verily I say unto you, go out, slaughter, murder, commit genocide, in short, all those ‘natural’ things! Make sure you multiply first so there are enough people around to kill! Thus, you need to give your head a shake!
Not coincidence, but not unique either.After all, the Bible recounts the Jews themselves committing genocides against the Midianites, Amelekites, and Canaanites.
You are a piece of work. This post is about a specific genocide but you manage(no surprise), to utilize the argument; Everyone else did it too! The only double standard is the one you subscribe to which is that of a white racist. You are of the worst kind, the ones who cloak their racism in pseudo intellectual babble. Well babble on.
LikeLike
@ Herneith
“….Nothing to understand, genocide is ‘inherent’ and ‘natural’ , just give into your natural impulses folks.
Thus and verily I say unto you, go out, slaughter, murder, commit genocide, in short, all those ‘natural’ things! Make sure you multiply first so there are enough people around to kill! Thus, you need to give your head a shake!…”
As usual this is masterful commentary Herneith!
“…You are a piece of work. This post is about a specific genocide but you manage(no surprise), to utilize the argument; Everyone else did it too! The only double standard is the one you subscribe to which is that of a white racist. You are of the worst kind, the ones who cloak their racism in pseudo intellectual babble. Well babble on…”
Which is where I would have to agree with this assessment. Randy I would regard as a pseudo intellectual. A clear give away with someone invested in this tendency is their habitual usage of an esoteric language. This is used, not for honest clarification but, for obfuscation of the issue discussed. Basically, its used as a deflection or distraction for hiding ones true meaning.
LikeLike
@ Randy
Consider these two statements from yourself…
“…I would offer that to fight something effectively, you must understand it completely. Thus my continued perseverance to uncover fallacies and double-standards…”
And this…
Abagond
“…I have tremendous respect for the opportunity you give people to discuss these topics and do not wish to abuse the privilege…”
Is it conceivable you may actually be squandering this unique opportunity to understand these issues? Instead you seem intent in subjecting everyone to your ill-informed, speculative and quite frankly ignorant theories?
Leaving aside whatever motivations you might have for a second…even you can see you may be arrogantly abusing this privilege.
LikeLike
Get in line for those reparations Hereros, Germans don’t open their pocketbooks for their victims. The most you’ll get is an apology-though that’s more than what the victims of the Japanese and Turks get anyhow.
An aside, Dr.Fischer who oversaw the genocide was a teacher of Dr. Mengele!
LikeLike
Abagond…Asa over at AftoSpear just posted a documentary video related to this post: http://afrospear.com/2012/09/25/the-forgotten-namibian-genocide/#comment-22210 I so appreciate the knowledge you both share!
I’d like to re-post yours along with his, if you don’t mind. Together they tell a history most of us know nothing about.
LikeLike
@ Deb
Great idea. Be my guest.
LikeLike
Thanks!
LikeLike
“Germans” hey!……….say no more.
LikeLike
Horrible. I remember reading somewhere that people believe this event is where Hitler got his ideas from in regards to Europe’s Jewish population.
And Germany, surprisingly or not, is probably one of the least racist places in Europe (although I hear there are far-right fascist strongholds in certain eastern towns, but the same can probably be said for the American South). Policies are nowhere near as racist as neighbouring Austria and Switzerland – now those countries are brimming with boneheads. Switzerland’s newest anti-immigration propaganda poster has – and I am not making this up – a group of white sheep grinning and cheering inside the Switzerland border, and a black sheep getting kicked outside the border. The slogan was “Remove the others, keep Switzerland safe!’ or some typical crap like that. Disgusting nativists.
LikeLike
I was really surprised that this was discussed here nearly two years ago. I first became aware of these atrocities about 8 years ago, while watching a documentary on television: titled, “Namibia – Genocide and the [Germany’s] Second Reich.”
Here is a 58 minute synopsis; (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O4OZ7Xc5pWQ) and for those who are interested, accompanying documentary films – Search: Second Reich, Germany on YouTube.
LikeLike
“How funny it is that we don’t get the history of the Herero massacre in our contemporary history classes – high school or university. White revisionism at its finest.”
This is a topic in German history classes (in Gymnasiums). Not as big as WW1, WW2 and the Holocaust, which take the biggest part, but it is a topic.
“Whites are all about power but not responsibility, as your comments show.” – Typical white scum! err…oh
““Germans” hey!……….say no more.” – I know right? Germans as a people are so racist! … err, wtf…
I agree that Germany should not only offer monetary reparations (for example to help the 17% of HIV positive Namibians) but also should officially acknowledge that this was genocide. We did a good job investigating the Holocaust, educating people about it and accept that German people did horrible things back then, why can’t we do that for this genocide?
LikeLike
@ whoami
“This is a topic in German history classes (in Gymnasiums). Not as big as WW1, WW2 and the Holocaust, which take the biggest part, but it is a topic.”
I can’t remember that beeing discussed in school. The colonial atrocities and genocides are generally not denied in Germany, but aren’t discussed that often. Most people I know know about it, but that could be my social bubble. And whenever Germany’s colonial past comes up, right-wingers deflect it with the “others did it too”-argument (in this case, the French and British).
LikeLike
i am interested in this discussion and i do not want to be biased in my comments since i am Herero. the truth is the Germans have committed a crime ‘genocide’, and matters worse they beheaded their victims more the same as ISIS of today. this action is far beyond from being hidden from the world because as long as we are alive the truth exists. no one will ever understand this evil because the so called colonizers seem to be avoiding to account to the definition of the result and its consequences. the victims never committed a crime in trying to defend their own land from the German terrorists. i will request to discuss this from a view point of understanding the issue and as well coming up with solutions to the same problem, to defend evil nor try to bring issues that are contrary to the main issue. lastly, let us show support to the repatriation of the Herero and Namaqua people and bring Germany to account on all its actions towards my people.
LikeLike
Just saw the You tube video about the Nama and Herero genocide and the atrocities committed by the Germans. Was not taught about this in school. Never heard about this until i came to this blog. These demons committed this evil because they were over crowded in Germany and need more space so they went to Africa took the African people’s land and became farmers. So arrogant and feeling superior to the Africans they decided to annihilate them. This genocide i am learning is before the Jewish holocaust. I wonder why it is nobody talks about the Herero and Nama genocide like the do the Jewish holocaust? I feel the Germans need to give the surviving grand children of the African holocaust victims reparations for the atrocities they committed. Seeing the severed heads of the dead Herero and Nama slaves so those demonic race scientist could do research to prove the Africans were animals and inferior to the Germans. Surely there these demons have there place in hell. After viewing this Youtube video and reading this thread post just makes me unsettled in my spirit and it just makes me sad to know these people suffered so under the hands of these demons. May their souls rest in peace,
LikeLike
@Andrew Kajuu: I hope grandchildren and great grand children of Herero and Nama people get the reparations owed them. The Germans are evil and need to be held accountable for this atrocity.
LikeLike
When i watched the Youtube on The Herero and Nama genocides i remember this quote from Lieutenant General Lothar Von Trotha. ” Every Herero with or without a gun, with or without cattle,will be shot. I will not longer accept women and children, i will drive them back to their people or i will let them be shot at.” This man like so many of those evil beast who were involved in the genocide of the Herero and Nama people, along with that beast Ogen Fischer the anthropologist and race scientist who took the severed heads of the dead Herero and Nama slaves to do experiments to promote their race science that the Africans were inferior and animals and the Germans were superior. It gives insight to how many white supremacist groups form their ideology.
LikeLike
It seems that the Germans are finally gearing up to admit they committed “genocide” against the Herero and Nama:
German authorities are set to officially recognize as “genocide” the colonial-era crackdown in Namibia by German troops more than a century ago in which over 65,000 ethnic Hereros were killed.
Talks with Namibia on a joint declaration about the events of the early 20th century are ongoing, and it isn’t clear when they will be concluded, German Foreign Ministry spokesman Martin Schaefer said Friday.
http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2015/7/10/german-authorities-set-to-recognize-genocide-in-colonial-namibia.html
They need to pay the Namibians for their land theft and gratuitous murders, just like they paid the Israeli Jews.
LikeLike
@Linda, Agreed!
LikeLike
I agree with reparations, now that I have read and learned more upon the idea. I do think Germany has not done enough to repay Namibia.
I swear, but am not sure, that the complicated part of anti-bigotry is how to end it and what to do with the privileged.
But one thing:
“Germany already proved itself to be a genocidal nation when Hitler was 15 years old.”
This is exactly what I mean by demonizing ethnicities. Even if you meant “state” when you said “nation”, that still makes Germany (nearly an exact nation-state) evil. I understand few nations committ genocide, but genocide doesn’t come from tenants of an ethnicity and shouldn’t be a permanent mark on an ethnicity’s record.
What are Germans (for instance) supposed to do to be acceptable? Magically cure what their ancestors’ poisoned? Nobody deserves to be hated by non-awful people.
And yes, I personally think Ashkenazi Jews (at least), should forgive ethnic Germans for Nazi Germany’s parts in the Holocaust. Ashkenazi Jews are only oppressed in France, easily the whitest nation ever. They even once colonized England.
LikeLike
I apologize for placing a tasteless comment here. I’m going to repost it in Germany’s or The Germanics’ comment thread. Apologies.
Abagond, can you remove it when I move the post?
LikeLike
http://www.africanglobe.net/business/white-businesses-panic-namibia-pushes-black-empowerment-bill/
LikeLike
Herneith, that’s the Mugabe effect in action: Indigenization and Economic Empowerment.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Came across this article in The Namibian. Earlier this year, the German government officially recognized the Armenian Genocide by the Turks in 1915. Turkey responded with their usual fire-breathing and denials of their crimes.
Less attention was given to the response of the Nama and Ovaherero people of Namibia to Germany’s grand gesture. According to Ndanki Kahiurika the descendants of the survivors of the Namibian Genocide had these responses:
http://www.namibian.com.na/151800/archive-read/Germanys-recognition-of-Armenian-genocide-criticised
It seems a major ingredient in true reparations is perpetrator groups talking directly to the injured parties and having them determine how they will be made whole again. Perpetrator groups of such massive crimes imposing their solutions (what they are willing to pay or what they are willing to do) only prolongs the pain and trauma of the injured group. “One way justice” is justice denied.
LikeLike
Theres only one word i can say. This was very barbaric, killing innocent men, woman and children. The German Government must apologise and pay Reparations.
LikeLike