The mantra argument is my name for the argument that persuades not through facts and reason, not through truth, but through repeating the same message over and over again. In American society it is the bedrock of both advertising and racism.
Most people will believe anything they have heard hundreds of times. Even in the Age of Google where things are easy to look up. Even when something has been disproved by scientists or scholars. Even when the message is clearly self-serving, like toothpaste ads by Colgate or the welfare queen stereotype pushed by Republicans.
In George Orwell’s “Animal Farm” (1945) animals take over a farm but the pigs soon get all the power into their hands. They maintain power in part by having the sheep repeat certain messages over and over again. This proves especially useful when the pigs are losing an argument: they end the argument by having the sheep talk over everyone, endlessly repeating the pigs’s message.
You see it on this blog all the time:
- After I write a carefully thought-out post showing how X is not true, some commenter will state X is true and say nothing about the points made by me in the post or by other commenters. As if their saying it makes it so.
- Some commenters after losing an argument will simply repeat their main point as if they did not lose at all. Or they will come back a few months later when they think everyone has forgotten and then repeat their main point again.
They are like those toys that only talk in canned phrases. They are like sheep mindlessly bleating.
Another common form of the mantra argument is the single story – like how we keep seeing black murderers or hungry African children on the news, as if that summed up Africa or Black America or something.
Racism: American society rains down racist messages on everyone day after day. For whites it leads to racism, for people of colour it leads to internalized racism. Even when you know that a given racist message is false, part of you still believes it because you have heard it so many times! But even worse are those racist messages that you never question at all.
What to do:
- Broaden your experience and knowledge. Travel. Read. Get to know people from all sorts of backgrounds. Do not depend on white English-speaking upper-middle-class men (0.2% of the world) for most of your knowledge. Get beyond their single story and self-serving views.
- Question everything: Many of the things that get repeated and believed in America as the truth cannot even stand up to a Google search. Even stuff that looks like it came from a newspaper did not but was simply made up. Find the source. Scientific papers, government numbers and opinion polls are twisted to serve a particular message. Schoolbooks have outright lies in them. And on and on. Question everything!
Just because the pigs and the sheep keep saying something does not make it true.
See also:
I love this post! When I saw the pic then looked at the title I just started laughing uncontrollably. It’s kind of like what the radio stations do, “play it til you like it”.
LikeLike
This is by far the best post I have read here yet! I am a communications major (among many others things) and my studies on the subject really opened my eyes to how the masses are manipulated.
You are right on point my friend. I hope I can influence more readers to consider reading your posts. Nothing but love for the truth.
LikeLike
Now is it a way to post this to my Facebook page. Forgive my ignorance. Thanks!
LikeLike
Keep doing your thing, Abagond! AWESOME 🙂
LikeLike
Yeah, I knew this was all about sheep from the moment I saw the picture.
The point is that once a person gets a certain idea into their mind, it is hard to get it out of their mind…..People like this LACK the ability to think rationally and probably send a lot of time watching TV and believe everything they see on TV.
Also, if you are told that person x has done A, B, or C, after hearing one side of the story, does is not make sense to hear the other side of the story from person x as well? It also makes sense to have both people present and involved when doing a recap of both sides of the story instead of asking each person separately, this way the TRUTH is not twisted into half truth or generally a bunch of lies.
This is all common sense to me anyway….But, I do get a bit frustrated when I can see that a great deal of the population have low intelligence, and instead of being leaders, need to be led and it shows. They will believe EVERYTHING they read in a paper just because it is printed as such, they will believe everything they have been told even if it is a bold faced lie.
For example, if someone told me that person x was a paedophile, a stripper, a prostitute or thief, I would have to do further research including questioning the person in order to determine whether these things are true or not. I would not just go ahead and believe everything I was told, simply because the person telling the story could be a LIAR or worse, could be mad.
If someone plants drugs in a person’s house, for example, just because you have seen those drugs there, this does not mean that the person who owns the house has planted the drugs or that the person is a drug dealer….Look up the meaning of “set-up”, or even there may be a better explanation for how or why the drugs got there.
Of course, most people lack the ability to think in an analytical manner, so why am I not surprised by any of this?
LikeLike
This post is one of the reasons why I stopped reading at length anything which invoves celebrities, simply because a lot of the stories written about them are made up, false or twisted in many ways in order to sell papers and make money.
A lot of the time, if you actually ask those concerned what the real story is, you will find that it is COMPLETELY different from the truth.
Besides, another reason why people go around making up false information about people is simply because they have a vendetta against the person.
Also, the worse thing about making false allegations is that the person who is at the centre of these false allegations is usually not even present to defend his or herself or to even respond to the false allegations……However, there are many people who like to play dirty most especially when there is money involved, so why is this of no surprise to me, once again?
To seek truth, go directly to the source and question that person at length and then have both people present, the accuser and the accused and you will find a cmpletely different story.
Besides, the Internet is full of nutcases, liars and weird people, so take everything you read with a pinch of salt and most especially, go to the source and ask questions…..That is what sensible people do, but then again everyone we come across in the world is not necessarily sensible, so there you go.
LikeLike
Sometimes this mechanism is referred to as the “Big Lie”, a more or less formalized propaganda technique that has its source in “Mein Kampf”.
LikeLike
“The mantra argument is my name for the argument that persuades not through facts and reason, not through truth, but through repeating the same message over and over again. In American society it is the bedrock of both advertising and racism.”
It is also the bedrock of fantasy, manipulation and deception. Mind Control on a massive scale. The type of massive mind population control that dupes the overwhelming majority of sheep-like citizens into believing that Osama Bin Laden actually masterminded the 911 attack from some caves in the mountains of Afghanistan which supposedly penetrated the best defended air space on the planet and brought down two super structures in a controlled demolition fashion after being hit by supposedly terrorist flown jet liners. Never mind that one smaller building 7 wasn’t hit by anything bigger than a rock, yet it somehow strangely came down in a demolition type fashion too. See the video documentary, Loose Change, and other volumes of research on the Internet about the matter.
The bad guys in Iraq were initially accused of having some sort of relationship with Bin Laden. When that reasoning didn’t quite work out as planned, it was said that Iraq was a threat to America that needed to be dealt with over there before the threat visited American soil, That was all the excuse the politic-rats and elites needed to wage a war against a small harmless country so they could hand pick their own people to run that nation in order to steal their oil. Same thing in Afghanistan for other profitable reasons. Pakistan also. Now the sounds and pitch of war drums have increased against Iran whose been painted a rogue nation by the west’s mainstream press as the stupid sheep are led along by their indiscriminate noses, doing the bidding of a tiny country known as Israel.
Americans are amongst the most lied to and manipulated people on Earth. They could very well be the number one group in this regard. Americans as a group do not think or reason analytically, otherwise they wouldn’t be the incredibly dumb and gullible sheep they are today, and the racial divide that was created to keep the people not united would have dissolved long ago.
LikeLike
@blanc2: Yes it is the same method. Like Josef Göbbels said: Nobody will believe in a small lie but they will belive a huge one when told about it often enough and well enough.
Once again, a good post!!
LikeLike
Excellent post! Of course, those who really need to get the message will do some fantastic gymnastics to avoid it, no? 😎
My studies in communications, sociology, and psychology were eye-openers when it comes to manipulation and the media…fascinating stuff.
LikeLike
i think your truth is truth. however i would question the profligate broad sweeping characterizations that you make of white people. I, as a white person, am admittedly ignorant about issues relating to your truth. It doesnt mean that individuals like me or others don’t want to learn more about your truth. If people genuinely believe that the racist truth (as you mentioned is perpetuated through various media) is their truth, do you think that decrying them as implicit racists is going to get them to understand what is going on? I think not. People of all persuasions need to see by example why their belief is faulty. They are not going to unabashedly receive someone else’s truth if it doesnt reconcile or resonate with the person they are targetting. It will seem inflammatory or condemnatory.
I guess it comes down to what you want to do with your voice.
LikeLike
Reminds me of the statistics class I took in high school. I utterly hated it as one of the most boring subjects of study possible, but I did pick up a piece of wisdom: first-hand experience how numbers can be manipulated to say what you want them to say. Still forget that sometimes though…
LikeLike
As soon as I read this post, I immediately thought of the media. Often the same images and stories are presented to us over and over and over again…as truth. Whenever poor people are shown, they are always black, involved in some kind of crime or the victims of it, uneducated, and live in inner cities. Most Latinos are from Mexico and live in this country illegally while “taking our jobs.” Patriotic people who serve in our military on multiple tours of duty, and who die for their country, are almost always shown as white. As far as foreign policy is conderned, America is usually right, and assumes that people in other parts of the world want to live in democracies and be just like us, (even when they don’t). And commercials imply that women (and men) have to look a certain way to be considered beautiful. Aside from the media, our government told us over and over again that Saddam Hussein was hoarding weapons of mass destruction that warranted a war costing billions of dollars per week. When does it end? The post suggests that we should question everything. I agree. Just because something is on tv, the radio or in print does not necessarily make it true.
LikeLike
This is an awesome post yet again Abagond. In the process of getting a passport!
LikeLike
Abagond,
What do you think of Dr. Frances Cress Welsing and the Isis Papers?
Have you read it by chance? I found her research to be remarkable and was shocked by the words of Mark Twain on the beauty of black skin. Blacks are kept ignorant of so much!
LikeLike
Excellent post!
My dad always said to us, ‘question everything, find the truth and prove it.’
LikeLike
JT,
“i think your truth is truth. however i would question the profligate broad sweeping characterizations that you make of white people. I, as a white person, am admittedly ignorant about issues relating to your truth. It doesnt mean that individuals like me or others don’t want to learn more about your truth. If people genuinely believe that the racist truth (as you mentioned is perpetuated through various media) is their truth, do you think that decrying them as implicit racists is going to get them to understand what is going on? I think not. People of all persuasions need to see by example why their belief is faulty. They are not going to unabashedly receive someone else’s truth if it doesnt reconcile or resonate with the person they are targetting. It will seem inflammatory or condemnatory.”
If you were check out some of his entries pertaining to race, especially the most recent ones, see how some people respond to his posts using the Mantra argument, see how Abagond responds, and see how they reply, would you seriously believe they would listen to anything said by a PoC no matter how civil it is? No. These people believe what they want to believe. They don’t give a damn about any evidence, proof, data, or whatever that proves them wrong. They just want to feel good and feel superior. That’s why they come over time and time again. They do this to push our buttons and to derail the topic for their own desires.
Being polite or nice doesn’t cut it some people. They prefer to live in their world where white is good and black is bad. Period. And I, for one, am tired of the same shit over and over again. For me, the time for politeness is done. Why the hell should I nice to them when they look down upon me from the damn start?
LikeLike
Great post.
It did make me think of the media, but also a particular someone I know who can be rather gullible. e.g. I’m sure many of you remember the bird flu scare a while ago and how newspapers were writing scary articles about how it is definitely going to become a world pandemic, etc. Many got ill and a number of people died, but it never reached that stage.
Then the same thing happened with the swine flu. When I read the same type of scary articles claiming we were all doomed, I thought, `Well, let’s wait and see if it starts going in that direction.’ This gullible person I know was immediately freaking out. They kept calling me and my husband and lecturing us about hygiene and that we have to wash our hands a million times a day and carry a bottle of liquid disinfectant, not go out too often in case people sneeze on us… LOL
I think there is no shortage of people who will believe anything you tell them, no matter how intelligent they may appear otherwise.
LikeLike
While abagond “believes” American society is raining down with racism, in fact, American society is something far less particular. It would be much more truthful to say that American society is radically liberated. American society ISN’T really anything particular at all. This is how the liberationist would have wanted it.
It’s either deception or ignorance for a black liberationist to speak of truth as though he was speaking of something absolute and not something simply relative to his perception.
A liberationist, by definition, doesn’t value Absolute Truth above all other things. He absolutely rejects it. He must. He’s a liberationist.
Self-evident evidence of the subordination of absolute truth to the sheer will of the liberationist is the black liberationist’s equating of white Supremacy to white degeneracy. The black liberationist is espousing his relative truth, not an absolute one. He is subtly asserting the inherent evil found within “white people” that he would otherwise suggest don’t really exist while simultaneously implying Supremacy equals degeneracy.
It’s mind-boggling… Especially for a black liberationist opening himself up to the Absolute Truth found in the Bible.
LikeLike
@ Samatha: I have not read Dr. Frances Cress Welsing.
@ JT
Those with ears will hear. The rest will never hear me no matter how nicely I try to put it:
LikeLike
Good post, good term. Other U.S. mantras, although rarely stated so bluntly–
“Capitalism good, socialism evil, and communism–simply absurd.”
“Asking the rich to pay higher taxes is class warfare. Letting the rich screw the rest of society is not class warfare–it’s the way things should be.”
“Non-white people are racially marked, and white people are just people.”
“Individual over community.”
“So many old people are in nursing homes because they don’t want to be a burden on their children.”
“Man-made global warming is a controversial theory.”
“Women who get raped may well have themselves to blame, at least in part.”
“Men are the new victims.”
“America is Number One. At least in anything that matters.”
“White is now black, because white people are the new victims.”
“The nuclear family is natural.”
“All other countries are jealous of America, and all their citizens wish they lived here.”
I could go on. We are a mightily deluded nation.
LikeLike
@Abagond,
I have not read Dr. Frances Cress Welsing.
I’d love to hear your take, especially on her ideas of white fear of genetic annihilation, and (if I remember right), her claim that homosexuality is a white invention designed to destroy the black race.
Anyone know if I got those two right?
LikeLike
you haven’t given adequate facts and reasons for why people should not be colorblind.
LikeLike
@ JT
“do you think that decrying them as implicit racists is going to get them to understand what is going on?”
Those with ears will hear. The rest will never hear me no matter how nicely I try to put it:
——————-
No one is telling you to say anything nicely. I was more asking what your purpose is for creating this prototypical white person. is it a sort of heads-up for all the racist mindfucks that will be pulled by the white person. Or is it a way to communicate to all people what is really going on? Is there any movement towards reconciliation in the process of elaborating on the white evils. Or is that even a worthwhile (or sane) goal?
Its not clear to me which is why i ask. Part of me sees the tragedy of white and black children unborn being thrust into a system in which even the smartest of us (i.e. you) are using their mental, spiritual, emotional resources towards compiling a divisive (however truthful) rendition of race relations. Maybe that is a more positive alternative then these unborn people being born unaware of the social dangers awaiting them. I dont know.
Nonetheless i do enjoy reading your work. Just had some questions and thoughts provoked in the process.
LikeLike
Another (white) American mantra:
“Pointing out racism is divisive.”
LikeLike
@aspergum
is that all that could be distilled from what i said?
LikeLike
JT,
Another (white) American mantra:
“Why aren’t you hearing what I MEANT to say? It’s intentions that matter, not effects!”
LikeLike
@ JT
My duty is to state the truth as best I can. That will help more people in the long run than anything else I can do.
LikeLike
Half the trick seems to be to coin the right term, watch it catch on, and that’s the argument already won.
In the UK, the media goes on about “benefit scroungers”, so now the assumption that many or most benefit (welfare) recipients are scroungers is ingrained in our minds. Another one is the “squeezed middle” – the idea that the middle classes are suffering disproportionately from cuts. The phrase is everywhere because it’s neat and catchy, whether or not there’s any truth to it.
LikeLike
@ Aspergum.
Could you imagine a scenario in which something i said didn’t fit your catch-all mantras? Or does the simple fact of being born white and speaking constitute a racial hate crime.
It is ultimately up to those individuals whose grievances are strongest to set the conditions for which reconciliation can be made. If you can only make statements about what is being said wrongly, you do not set up the grounds for situations in which something can be said right. At which point, it becomes clear that you never wanted things to be said correctly from the get go.
@ Abagond
Spike Lee’s masterful film “Do the Right Thing” outlines his truth. It’s not one that pretties up bigotry. Nor does it hide historical injustice. However unlike an approach that posits that people can only be one way, it posits a way in which we can change as people and we can avoid the same tired anachronisms.
My personal truth is that we need to confront what has been done against PoC thoroughly and persistently in all forms of media for generations to come. It is not quietness that is needed but loudness.
However can we make space for white people to admit the mistakes of the past, the mistakes of the present and unfortunate inheritance that we have because we are born from a people that glorified the rape, enslavement, destruction, of another people and continue to profit from that system? Or do you take down the hypothetically innocent individuals (i.e. the unborn, or the conscientious) in the process of taking down the evils of the system and the majority of the white population. To what end? To tell the truth? If that is the case, i would reassert that such an individual never wanted things to progress in any way in the first place.
LikeLike
@JT
i think your truth is truth. however i would question the profligate broad sweeping characterizations that you make of white people. I, as a white person, am admittedly ignorant about issues relating to your truth. It doesnt mean that individuals like me or others don’t want to learn more about your truth.
Its interesting here how you keep referring to your truth as this just highlights IMO the fact that there is an ‘alternative’ (for lack of a better word)reality to all that is reported and documented about any person. Some of this is down to lack of thorough research and investigation, others are due to personal perspective viewpoint and/or experience.
If people genuinely believe that the racist truth (as you mentioned is perpetuated through various media) is their truth, do you think that decrying them as implicit racists is going to get them to understand what is going on? I think not. People of all persuasions need to see by example why their belief is faulty. They are not going to unabashedly receive someone else’s truth if it doesnt reconcile or resonate with the person they are targetting. It will seem inflammatory or condemnatory.
Are you trying to say here JT that there arent any ‘positive’ examples for the media to report on so they continually write about the ‘negative’ examples instead? Dont you think that there are enough examples out there for them not to consistenly focus on whats bad? The saying that applies here is, “you can take a horse to water but you can’t make it drink” and it is the same IMO for changing the mindset of those who want to view certain races through a negative lens – you cant force them to change and if fact they dont want to change as it benefits them in some way on some level so why would they take on board any other stance?
LikeLike
@Sarah W:
“In the UK, the media goes on about “benefit scroungers”, so now the assumption that many or most benefit (welfare) recipients are scroungers is ingrained in our minds. Another one is the “squeezed middle” – the idea that the middle classes are suffering.’
—
It’s the same in the U.S. There is the illusion that the middle class is being squeezed by the poor, not taking into account that policies benefitting the rich are doing the squeezing. The private sector, (honorable mention Lehman Brothers), is not innocent in the matter, either. This is the diet of truth(?) we are being fed. Unfortunately, a lot of people are eating what they are being fed without looking at the list of ingredients on the package. This leads to misdirected anger and divisiveness. Jacked-up policies along with the private sector’s bad decisions fueled by greed are the culprits, not the poor.
LikeLike
“Do The Right Thing” was a masterful film? In which universe?
I recall it as a undigestible piece of tripe, personally…then again, I love British humour and others don’t, so – to each their own. 😎
LikeLike
JT,
Could you imagine a scenario in which something i said didn’t fit your catch-all mantras? Or does the simple fact of being born white and speaking constitute a racial hate crime.
No, it doesn’t. But being born white does make one likely to bear and enact certain common racist proclivities, often unconsciously. Can you see the difference?
Why are you more concerned with protecting white people as a group from blanket condemnation than with examining the possibility of your own white(ned) proclivities? Assuming, that is, that you are white.
It is ultimately up to those individuals whose grievances are strongest to set the conditions for which reconciliation can be made. If you can only make statements about what is being said wrongly, you do not set up the grounds for situations in which something can be said right. At which point, it becomes clear that you never wanted things to be said correctly from the get go.
As I think Abagond just more or less said, pointing out something wrong is one way of helping make it right.
Must those who point out the emperor’s lack of clothes also perform the task of running around to find him something to cover up his ugly bits with?
And while it would indeed be fair and just if “those individuals whose grievances are strongest” could set the conditions for which reconciliations can be made, the dynamics of power just don’t work that way. In terms of race, white people have long established and maintained the terms of debate and adjudication. Sad thing is, most white people who engage in racial dialogue with non-whites don’t even realize how they tend to think and act within that framework, a white racial frame that automatically privileges themselves and their own ways of seeing things.
LikeLike
@Abagond
If we are to question everything, as you have suggested, is it okay to question your beliefs on race and politics? Probably not, considering that you speak the unequivocal truth and everybody else is an ‘ignorant’ racist who needs to believe the same thing you do–your anti-White racism mantra.
Your comment section, for example, is no more than an echo chamber characterized by the same sheep-like behavior mentioned above. They laud each new post as the greatest yet and fail to notice, through their blind faith, that it’s just another mantra repetition.
What of those commentators you say simply state “X is true?” Just like you, they’re not interested in changing their opinion because they already know “the truth.” Objectively, you’re no different from the people you slam–save for the thoughts and ideals you think we should be conditioned to believe.
To say that the mantra argument isn’t an effective public opinion manipulator is to speak with false tongue. You would have yours on every wall and in every heart, yet you disdain its use when it does not favor your ideologies.
tl;dr Just because Abagond and all of my English teachers keep saying something does not make it true.
LikeLike
“Must those who point out the emperor’s lack of clothes also perform the task of running around to find him something to cover up his ugly bits with?”
@ aspergum:
Beautifully stated! Love the analogy… 😎
LikeLike
810,
tl;dr Just because Abagond and all of my English teachers keep saying something does not make it true.
True, but just because Abagond or anyone else says something repeatedly doesn’t make it just another “ideology” either. Some TRUTHS bear repeating, especially those that white people in general have been ignoring for decades, and in the case of many truths, centuries.
LikeLike
@aspergum
Baa.
LikeLike
810,
“Baa” as in “humbug,” or “Baa” as in “I’m a sheep who refuses to seriously engage with you”?
LikeLike
How does one know when “the mantra argument” and “the single story” as logical fallacies actually apply to a debate?
For example, say that Person A and Person B are discussing a someone with pathological obesity.
Person A: “See that fellow? His obesity is endangering his life.”
Person B: “To improve his health, he must eat less and exercise more.”
Person A: “It’s not his fault, as he was raised in a tradition where unhealthful foods are customary.”
Person B: “To improve his health, he must eat less and exercise more.”
Person A: “The big agribusiness companies promote the over consumption of processed food.”
Person B: “To improve his health, he must eat less and exercise more.”
Person A: “His neighborhood has fewer healthier food options than more affluent neighborhoods.”
Person B: “To improve his health, he must eat less and exercise more.”
Person A: “You don’t listen! You’re guilty of ‘the mantra argument’ and ‘the single story'”.
Person B: “I repeat my suggestion because ultimately it is the only advice which will help the fellow, and you haven’t offered a viable and superior alternative.”
Person A: “Hey Persons C, D, and E, isn’t Person B just simply awful?”
Person B: “That’s not an argument against my position.”
LikeLike
@aspergum
“Baa,” as in the noise a sheep makes when it proves my point.
@Randy
Somebody gets it. I wrote a post on something similar, with an illustrative excerpt from Spinal Tap.
LikeLike
“Baa,” as in the noise a sheep makes when it proves my point.
Your achievement of such a heightened state of solipsistic delusion is truly impressive.
(Is it solipsistic in here, or is it just me? 🙂 )
LikeLike
@aspergum
Now you’re proving Randy right…
LikeLike
810,
Pfffft!
Sho fly, you bother me.
LikeLike
You sort aren’t great with logic.
LikeLike
810,
Nothing you’ve said trumps the arguments coming from abagond, aspergum, Demerera etc. You might not agree but that doesn’t make them illogical.
LikeLike
@810
You sort aren’t great with logic.
Doesnt take much for your facade to drop and for the thin veneer of narrow mindedness to rear its ugly head.
I think, this is what most commenters on blogs like this learn to realise – those who come on here to engage, interact and learn something, where in turn, they will be open to an exchange of ideas. Not some witless person who, whilst they may able to quote repetitive soundbites from noteworthy individuals of yesteryear and not take on board the context in terms current ‘societal’ examples. This can be particularly frustrating when their assertions are not based on personal knowledge, but merely on generalisations and stereotypes.
As smart as you try to portray you are, you must know that any individual who prophesses to be knowledgeable should have done their research and that this should come from a wide range of validated sources. Most importantly, they should be open to any counter arguments therein and be able to logically examine them and then, using ALL of the information given, come to a balanced conclusion.
LikeLike
@ Demerera:
Exactly. This is one reason I don’t bite the troll-bait…when you know one is just going to dismiss everything you say, even when you’re speaking from personal experience, then answering their loaded questions is a pointless exercise in futility.
LikeLike
@sepultra13
Can understand what you say here. Its like banging your head against a brick wall…
LikeLike
@ Demerera
A little advice:
1) Next time, make an effort to check your spelling before you insult somebody’s intelligence.
2) Bleating louder doesn’t make you a better sheep.
LikeLike
810,
I don’t think you’re in any position to call anyone sheep seeing as how you repeat and follow the same HBD garble that your friends, Piggy, Unamused, and Steve Sailer as seen on your page.
LikeLike
@810
1) Next time, make an effort to check your spelling before you insult somebody’s intelligence.
In the part of the world that I come from there’s nowt wrong with my spelling – broaden your horizons a little, you might learn something besides your local yokel U.S truth! BTW, just because I have an ‘alternative’ viewpoint to yours, does not make me part of the ‘herd’ on the contrary, it makes me an individual. Your response overall seems quite petulant and yet, is very telling!
Anyway, don’t most people gravitate towards people they have something in common with? Who would deliberately seek out the most antagonistic individuals to be amongst on a daily basis other than for masochistic purposes. I hear the name ‘Stormfront’ on this blog every now and then and guess its something to do with ‘right wingers’. I wonder if you are going on sites such as this to tell them that they too are ‘cattle’ and that they should get a life? Somehow I doubt it which is a shame as that would give you more credence on a blog like this.
As my point above was leaning towards, I am guessing that the idea of your own blog is to put your view across in the hope of engaging in debate but overall, you wish to interact with your commenters and maybe, just maybe, learn something new – isnt it? Please dont tell me that in your arrogance you actually believe you are the next Messiah – ‘He/She who must be obeyed’.
Practice what you are trying to preach here – dont get ‘stroppy’ because others seem to have a different viewpoint to you. Take on board what has been said and compare and contrast with that which you ‘think’ you already know. It doesnt take Einstein to appreciate that this is where you will develop a ‘balanced’ viewpoint.
LikeLike
Abagond:
Media has nothing to do with entertainment. Brainwashing and deception is cloaked within commercials, soap-operas, court-shows, talk-shows, comedies, dramas, movies, music, fashion, sports, porn, etc. Decoding the bs is so simple, yet, many of us fail to connect the dots, as it relates to black people. Using biracial actors in place of real blacks in tv commercials, movies, videos, etc. Bombarding blackmen with hip-hop and sports on a daily basis. Plastering mixed whitewomen who look like blackwomen all over tv, internet, and magazines. And, at the same time blocking real blackwomen from doing the same. Local news stations seeking out the most uneducated among us to comment on whatever news event that took place that particular day. Continually showing black mothers who make excuses for the criminal behavior of their sons, creating a false premise that blackwomen are bad mothers who don’t know how to raise their children to be productive members of society. Beating up on blacks who refuse to be “liberal” by default. What law mandates that blacks have to be members of a political party that wants to enslave them? I could go on and on, but, you get the gist of what i’m saying black people?
Tyrone
Black Eros Movement
LikeLike
Whites have their own mantra agrument as well. That’s why they classify themselves as having no culture, being boring, bland and not measuring up to black men. They are so good at victimization, that they victimize themselves without realizing it.
LikeLike
“Many of the things that get repeated and believed in America as the truth cannot even stand up to a Google search”
The anti-white cult pretends that forcefully eliminating white people with mass immigration and “assimilation” imposed on ALL white countries and ONLY white countries is not genocide under international law.
Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-white.
LikeLike
“Sometimes this mechanism is referred to as the “Big Lie”, a more or less formalized propaganda technique that has its source in “Mein Kampf””
What was actually said was:
But the most brilliant propagandist technique will yield no success unless one fundamental principle is borne in mind constantly and with unflagging attention. It must confine itself to a few points and repeat them over and over. Here, as so often in this world, persistence is the first and most important requirement for success.
Actually from “War Propaganda”, in volume 1, chapter 6 of Mein Kampf (1925), by Adolf Hitler
Stalin said If you repeat a lie often enough, it becomes the truth.
So ironically the lie is that Hitler or Goebbels said this at all. The lie has been repeated so many time people believe they did. The truth it was Stalin does not get mentioned.
LikeLike
Nobody is saying that Black neighbourhoods needs more diversity.
Nobody is saying that Hispanic neighbourhoods needs more diversity.
They are already 100% diverse.
People are only telling White children in White neighbourhoods needs more diversity.
White neighbourhoods will be 100% diverse when there are no white people left.
Diversity is a code-word for white genocide.
LikeLike
When someone said blending the races by force was genocide, I laughed. The ideal is diversity ending in homogenization leaving two classes, a rich white-asian-semite class as rulers and a Heinz 57 variety of works to satisify the ruling classes needs. Agreed?
Blending a black with a white and you still have a white.
Blending a Great Dane and a Chichuahua and you still have a perfect Great Dane. Because race means nothing.
No harm done.
I never would have known about this laughable white genocide or the term anti-term without your post.
LikeLike